Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Ramos-Rivera”
United States v. Rivera-Ramospublic domain
578 F.3d 1111 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Efrain RIVERA-RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-10174. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 2009. Filed August 21, 2009. Roger H. Sigal, Tucson, AZ, for the defendant-appellant. Diane J. Humetewa, United States Attorney, and Angela
United States v. Efrain Rivera-Ramospublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10174 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:07-cr-00307-RCC- EFRAIN RIVERA-RAMOS, HCE-1 Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States Distr
Rivera-Ramos v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rivera-Ramos v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Ramos v. Rivera (In Re Rivera)public domain
217 B.R. 379 (1998) In re Luis RIVERA, Debtor. Pedro RAMOS & Zoila Ramos, Co-Trustees, Plaintiffs, v. Luis RIVERA, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 93-52142, Adversary No. 93-5230. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut. February 2, 1998. *380 Melissa A. Buckley, Buckley & Buckley, New Haven, CT, for plaintiffs.
United States v. Raul Rivera Ramos, A/K/A Raulitopublic domain
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Chief Judge. Defendant-appellant Raul Rivera Ramos appeals from the district court’s denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion to correct his sentence. 1 Defendant argues that the three-count indictment to which he pled guilty charged only one offense, and consequently, the maximum sentences imposed con
Ramos-Rivera v. Peakepublic domain
ON MOTION DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and remand for further proceedings. The Secretary states that Jose D. Ramos-Rivera consents. The Board of Veterans Appeals denied Ramos-Rivera’s claim for service connection for gastroesophageal reflu
Rivera-Ramos v. Arroyo-Chiquespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default as to Defendants Municipality of Aguas Bue-nas, Mayor Luis Arroyo Chiques, and Nelson J. Ortiz Reyes is hereby GRANTED. (Docket No. 12.) Said Defendants were served with process on January 21 and 22, 2014. (See Docket 9.) The deadline to answer and/or otherwise plead contained in Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(A)(i) &
Rivera v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
229 F.3d 292 (1st Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,V.JOHN ALEXIS MOJICA-BAEZ, DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,V.JOSUE G. REYES-HERNANDEZ, DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,V.RODOLFO E. LANDA-RIVERA, DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,V.NELSON CARTAGENA-MERCED, DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,V.<
United States v. Riverapublic domain
MARK L. WOLF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On March 7, 2018, the court noted that First Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 4.26.5681(d) concerning Possession of an Unregistered Firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d), indicates that the jury should be instructed that the government must prove both that the defen
Martínez-Rivera v. Sánchez-Ramospublic domain
609 F.Supp.2d 213 (2009) Cruz MARTÍNEZ-RIVERA, et al., Plaintiffs v. Roberto SÁNCHEZ-RAMOS, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-2146 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 20, 2009. *214 Edwin Prado-Galarza, Prado, Nunez & Associates, PSC, Francisco Ramos-Martinez, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. Alex J.
Martinez-Rivera v. Sanchez-Ramospublic domain
570 F.Supp.2d 247 (2008) Cruz MARTINEZ-RIVERA, et al., Plaintiffs v. Roberto SANCHEZ-RAMOS, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-2146 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 20, 2008. *249 Edwin Prado-Galarza, Prado, Nunez & Associates, PSC, Francisco Ramos-Martinez, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Maria Jud
JACOBS, Circuit Judge: We have previously affirmed the conviction of defendants Roberto Figueroa and Hector Rivera, after a jury trial in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Keenan, /.), for conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(b)(1)(A) and 841(b)(1)(B).
Martinez-Rivera v. Sanchez Ramospublic domain
498 F.3d 3 (2007) Cruz MARTÍNEZ-RIVERA, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Roberto SÁNCHEZ RAMOS, et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 06-2398. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted May 11, 2007. Decided August 7, 2007. *4 Jo-Ann Estades Boyer, for appellants. Salvador J. Antonnetti-Stutts
Martinez-Rivera v. Sanchez Ramospublic domain
430 F.Supp.2d 47 (2006) Cruz MARTINEZ-RIVERA, et al., Plaintiff(s) v. Roberto SANCHEZ RAMOS, et al., Defendant(s). Civil No. 05-2146 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 4, 2006. *48 Edwin Prado-Galarza, Prado, Nunez & Associates, PSC, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. *49<
United States v. Santiago-Corderopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 13-2017, 13-2047, 13-2072 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. WENDELL RIVERA-RUPERTO, a/k/a Arsenio Rivera, MIGUEL SANTIAGO-CORDERO, DAVIEL SALINAS-ACEVEDO, Defendants, Appellants. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Puga-Rodriguez v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
United States v. Ramirez-Riverapublic domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. After a jury convicted Defendants-Appellants José Laureano-Salgado, Pedro Ramirez-Rivera, and Ismael Cruz-Ramos (collectively, “the Defendants”) 1 of *12 numerous drug and gun crimes, a district court judge sentenced t
Anderson v. United Statespublic domain
MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm. Background In a March 20