Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 07-1663, 07-1664 EMILY MCINTYRE, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN L. MCINTYRE; CHRISTOPHER MCINTYRE, IN HIS CAPACITY AS CO- ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN L. MCINTRYE, Plaintiffs, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

447 F.Supp.2d 54 (2006) Emily McINTYRE and Christopher McIntyre as co-administrators of the Estate of John L. McIntyre, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-CV-10408-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 5, 2006. *55 *56

545 F.3d 27 (2008) Emily McINTYRE, as Administrator of the ESTATE OF John L. McINTYRE; Christopher McIntyre, in His Capacity as Co-Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntrye, Plaintiffs, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, H. Paul Rico; John Morris; John J. Connolly, Jr.; Roderick Kennedy; Robert R. Fitzpatrick; James Ring; James W. Greenleaf; James Ahearn; Kevin J. Weeks; James J

ORDER JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge. Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Golden Rule Ins. Co./United-Healthcare Corp.’s (“Golden Rule”) Motion for Summary Judgment. [.Filing No. JJ.]1 *941I. STANDARD OF REVIEW A motion f

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0134p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ TIMOTHY KING, et al., │

*806 OPINION DIETZEN, Justice. Blandin Paper Company (“Blandin”) filed 156 property tax petitions to challenge the assessor's estimates of market value, for purposes of property tax assessments, for 4,680 parcels of land constituting roughly 187,000 acres of land located in Aitkin,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA US DOMINION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00040 (CJN) SIDNEY POWELL, et al., Defendants. US DOMINION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00213 (CJN) RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, Defendant. U

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )

88 P.3d 1165 (2004) 207 Ariz. 553 NORDSTROM, INC., a corporation; Scottsdale Fashion Square Partnership, a partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. No. 1 CA-TX 02-0021. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department T. April 29, 2004. *1167

NEUMANN, Justice. William Chaussee, as conservator of Toby Ramsland, has appealed a district court judgment entered in his action to set aside deeds conveying interests in real property to Elvira Thiel; for the return of other property to Toby Ramsland; for payment to Toby of the *790proceeds of any lease or sale of farmland by Thiel; and for damages, costs, disbursem

116 P.3d 1193 (2005) STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Richard J. GLASSEL, Appellant. No. CR-03-0022-AP. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. August 10, 2005. *1200 Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General, by Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Capital Litigation Section, Robert L. Ellman, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Attorneys fo

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. This case arises out of claims by the plaintiff Donald R. Wood, Jr. (“Wood” or the “plaintiff’), on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated persons, that the defendants the Village of Patchogue (“Pat-chogue” or the “Village”) and forty eight of its present and former officials and employees (collectively, the “defendants”) created a schem

311 F.Supp.2d 344 (2004) Donald R. WOOD, Jr., individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF PATCHOGUE OF NEW YORK, F. Taldone, individually and in his capacity as constable, Mary Pontieri, individually and in her capacity as former Village of Patchogue clerk, Todd C. Johnson individually and in his capacity as former Village of Patchogue treasurer, Rose Marie Berger, individually and in her capa

240 B.R. 328 (1999) In re NORTHGATE COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., Debtor. Brian F. Leonard, Trustee of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of Northgate Computer Systems, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Mylex Corporation, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 94-34357. Adversary No. 96-3298. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division. October 15, 1999.

876 F.Supp. 614 (1994) ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF THE MENTALLY HANDICAPPED, INC., a New Jersey Not-for-Profit Corporation, Creative Property Management of N.J., Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, and Annie Sims and James Williams, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ELIZABETH, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey, City Council of the City of Elizabeth, and William Rapp, in his capacity as Director of Construction for the City of Elizabeth, Defe

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-24-00080-CV OBRA J. MOORE, III, INDIO MINERALS LLC, GUNNER OIL SERIES LLC, AND MADAKET ENERGY LLC, COBALT NATURAL RESOURCES LLC, AND MAGNOLIA NATURAL RESOURCES LLC, Appellants V. 1789 MINERALS FUND I, LP, ROCKCLIFF ENERGY OPERATING LLC, CADDO MINERALS

356 Mass. 300 (1969) 249 N.E.2d 583 EDWARD J. KAYE vs. CHEEVER NEWHALL. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. May 6, 1969. June 26, 1969. Present: WILKINS, C.J., WHITTEMORE, CUTTER, SPIEGEL, & REARDON, JJ. Donald N. Sweeney (Samuel Hoar, Jr., with him) for the defendant. Bernard A. Dwork (

HUGHES, Justice. This is a Rule 371 case in which the Railroad Commission of Texas on August *47529, 1966, issued a permit to Wiley Richard Lee to drill a first well for oil and gas on a .107 acre tract of land in the East Texas Oil Field in Gregg County “to pre*476vent confiscation

Cutter, J. Count 1 of the declaration in an action of *137tort alleged that the defendant, a surgeon, failed to remove the plaintiff’s appendix completely during an operation, on May 1,1949, was doubtful whether he had done so, and negligently failed to inform the plaintiff of his doubts, with the consequence that the plainti