Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2782 ___________________________ United States of America Petitioner - Appellee v. Randall Lee Comly

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0033p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

FLOYD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Randall Cornette was sentenced as an armed career criminal because of certain predicate state convictions that the district court considered to be "violent felonies" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924 (

BENTON, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Randall Scott Davenport of two counts of sexual exploitation of a child and production of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (a), and one count of possession of child pornography under

KELLY, Circuit Judge. Randall Steward pleaded guilty to sex trafficking of a child in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591 . At sentencing, Steward objected to various aspects of the presen-tence report. The district court

OPINION SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In 2005, Defendant Randall Sutton committed four armed bank robberies in quick succession in Kentucky and in Ohio. Defendant agreed to plead guilty to the Kentucky charges in the Southern District of Ohio and the case was properly transferred from the Eastern District of Kentuc

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0251p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Defendant Randall Jennings pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing, the district court found that Jennings’ prior convictions in Minnesota for simple robbery and felony domestic assault constituted convictions for crimes of violence for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Ac

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Cory James Randall has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Randall has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record re

KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part.. I respectfully dissent from the court’s conclusion that the evidence of former Lit-*1002tie Rock Police Department (LRPD) Detective Charles Weaver’s misconduct was not material to the defendant’s conviction for marijuana distribution. Weaver was the mai

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Randall Causey was part of a conspiracy that preyed on novice real estate investors during the housing bubble in 2005-06, defrauding both borrowers and lenders alike. A five-day trial revealed that Causey and his co-conspirators would do just about anything to complete a sale and make a profit, whether it was making promises they had no intention of keepin

666 F.3d 1238 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chester RANDALL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-3257. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 2, 2011. *1239 Chester Randall, Jr., pro se. Before ANDERSON and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges, and BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.[*]

661 F.3d 1291 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chester RANDALL, Jr., a/k/a "Insane June," Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-3113. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. November 1, 2011. *1292 Carl Folsom of Bell Folsom, P.A., Lawrence, KS, for Defendant-Appellant. James A. Brown, Assistant United

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DAVIS wrote the opinion,, in which Judge KEENAN and Judge FLOYD joined. DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Randall Justin McGee was convicted in the Southern District of West Virginia of possession,with intent to distribute oxyco-done, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and sentenced to fifty-five months of imprisonment. On ap

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cliff Bernard Randall appeals the district court’s order granting Randall’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Mfirnied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jeron Rondell Randall appeals the district court's order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, United States v

BEAM, Circuit Judge. This is defendant Randall Muhlenbruch’s second appeal in this child pornography case. In the first appeal, United States v. Muhlenbruch, 634 F.3d 987 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 228, 181 L.Ed.2d 127 (2011) (Muhlenbruch I), we held that Muhlenbruch’s convictions for both receiving child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), and possessing child

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant David Randall appeals from his conviction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Scullin, /.). He challenges the District Court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence found during the search and seizure of his computer equipment and statements he made to police officers and the District Court’s sentencing decision. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the fa

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cliff Bernard Randall appeals the district court’s order granting Randall’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Mfirnied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jeron Rondell Randall appeals the district court's order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, United States v