Cases

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Travis Dean Rendon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Rendon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the re

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT CAMPBELL, Senior Judge: At a contested trial, officer and enlisted general court-martial members convicted the appellant of aggravated assault, assault consummated by a battery, and disorderly conduct—violations of Articles 128 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 928 and 934 (2012). The convenin

CCA 201500408. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 19, 2017.

607 F.3d 982 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin RENDON, a/k/a Lina, a/k/a linalil, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-4687. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: March 24, 2010. Decided: June 17, 2010. *984 ARGUED: William Todd Watson, Office of The Federal Public Defender, A

MEMORANDUM ** Blanca Rendon appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and three-month sentence for forged endorsement on treasury check, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 510(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rendon’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no ground

621 F.3d 1307 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose de Jesus RENDON-ALAMO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-2089. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. October 19, 2010. Submitted on the briefs:[*] Stephen E. Hosford, CJA Appointed Counsel, Arrey, NM, for Defendant-Appellant. Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Atto

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-30200 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-05-00087-2-a- GREGORY ANTHONY RENDON- RRB DUARTE, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM: * Jose Ascension Rendon-Gareia appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry into the United States after a previous deportation. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Corrected Reprint 6/21/2007 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-30200 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. GREGORY ANTHONY RENDON-  CR-05-00087-2- a-RRB DUARTE, AMENDED D

BRUCE, Judge: Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was found guilty of the following offenses: one specification of an attempt to wrongfully distribute some quantity of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), in violation of Article 80, of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 880; five spec

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Washington, D.C. UNITED STATES v. David D. RENDON Seaman (E-3), U.S. Coast Guard CGCMS 24226 Docket No. 1168 26 November 2002 Spe

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. Because the parties are familiar with the background of this appeal, it will not be set out. The first issue presented for review is whether the joint representation of Rios*529Rendon and a co-conspirator prior to sentencing created a conflict of interest that required the District Court to condu

Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellee, Seaman (E-3) David D. Rendon, was tried by special court-martial at the *222 United States Coast Guard Training Center, Yorktown, Virginia. Pursuant to his pleas he was con

213 F.Supp.2d 718 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, v. Raul RENDON-RODRIGUEZ. No. CRIM. L-01-754. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Laredo Division. January 30, 2002. *719 Raul Rendon-Rodriguez, pro se. Federal Public Defender, Laredo, TX, for Raul Rendon-Rodriguez. Pretrial Services — LA, U.S. Probation, Lar

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM *** Rosa Rendon-Ruiz appeals her conviction for importing and possessing with intent to distribute 63.9 pounds of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 952 and 960. We affirm. On July 25, 2001, we vacated submission of Rendon-Ruiz’s claims under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. *968</

MEMORANDUM *** Rosa Rendon-Ruiz appeals her conviction for importing and possessing with intent to distribute 63.9 pounds of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 952, and 960. Regardless of whether our review is for plain error, de novo, or for abuse of discretion, there was no impermissible vouching or prosecutorial misconduct requiring reversal. We therefore affirm on the issue of misconduct,

79 F.Supp.2d 1361 (1999) UNITED STATES of America v. Carlos RENDON-MARQUEZ, Defendant. No. 2:98-CR-53-WCO. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Gainesville Division. August 5, 1999. *1362 Henry Allen Moye, Assistant United States Attorney, Atlanta, GA, for plaintiff. Lynn Gitlin Fant, Federal Defender Program, Atlan

152 F.3d 934 U.S.v.Rendon-Molina* NO. 97-4983 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. July 31, 1998 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No.9600642CRJAL 1 Affirmed.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2515 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Frank G. Rendon

47 F.3d 1158 U.S.v.Rendon NO. 94-1252 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Jan 24, 1995 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y.92-cr-51 1 AFFIRMED.