Cases

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Jimmy Augusto Restrepo appeals from a February 2, 2006 amended judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Burns, J.), sentencing him principally to a term of 293 months’ imprisonment, resulting from his guilty plea on one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlyin

594 F.Supp.2d 15 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, v. Luis Horacio RESTREPO MARTINEZ, Defendant. Criminal Case No. 06-232-8(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 27, 2009. Joanne D. Slaight, Washington, DC, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM & ORDER ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Luis Horacio Restrepo Mart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) v. § Criminal Case No. 06-232-8 (RCL) LUIS HORACIO RESTREPO MARTINEZ )) Defendant. g Fl L E D ’ JAN 2 z 2009 MEMORANDUM & ORDER NANCY MA¥ER WH|TT#NGTON, CLEN( u.s. nrsrnccr count Luis Horacio Restrepo Martinez has been charged with conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of2l U.S.C. §§ 959, 960, 963 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Now before the Court is the government’s oral motion for pr

MEMORANDUM ** Isidro Giovanni Restrepo-Perez appeals from the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court. Restrepo-Perez contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court placed undue emphasis on the

MEMORANDUM ** Isidro Giovanni Restrepo-Perez appeals from the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court. Restrepo-Perez contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court placed undue emphasis on the

516 F.Supp.2d 112 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Juan Carlos RESTREPO-SUARES, aka Juan Carlos Restrepo-Suarez aka Barbas, Defendant. Criminal Action No. 04-034-06 (JDB), Civil Action No. 07-0450 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 15, 2007. *113 Sarah Weyler, Steven N. Siegel, United States Depa

330 F.Supp.2d 72 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. Reynaldo RESTREPO CONTRERAS, Defendant No. CRIM.89-371 JP. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 16, 2004. *73 Warren Vazquez, United States Attorney's Office, Torre Chardon, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Reynaldo Restrepo Contreas, McRae, GA, Pro

59 F.Supp.2d 133 (1999) UNITED STATES of America v. Jose Alberto RESTREPO, a/k/a Juan Gonzalez. No. Cr 98-10377-MLW. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 1, 1999. Peter C. Horstmann, Bailey, Fishman & Leonard, Boston, MA, for Jose Alberto Restrepo. Timothy Q. Feeley, U.S. Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for U.S. MEMORANDU

150 F.3d 1197 U.S.v.Restrepo* NO. 97-4707 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. July 6, 1998 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No.9600649CRKMM 1 Affirmed.

124 F.3d 221 U.S.v.Restrepo-Valencia* NO. 96-4485 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug 19, 1997 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No.9500189CRKMM 1 Affirmed.

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Augusto Restrepo-Aguilar pleaded guilty to a charge of unlawful reentry into the United States after deportation. At sentencing, the district court added 16 offense levels under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(2) to Restrepo-Aguilar’s Guidelines sentence, based on a finding that he had been previously “deported after a conviction for an aggravated felony.” The sole iss

87 F.3d 1313 U.S.v.Restrepo* NO. 95-10128 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. May 21, 1996 Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 3:94-CR-043-R 1 AFFIRMED IN PART.

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES OF COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 94-1053 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v.

PER CURIAM. Defendant-appellant Jaime Valencia pled guilty to conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute it. See 21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court sentenced appellant to 188 months imprisonment followed by a period of supervised release. Valencia now appeals, arguing that the district court erred in increasing his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 for obstructi

890 F.Supp. 180 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Christian John RESTREPO, Alberto Caro, and Jose Francisco Guevara, Defendants. No. 94-CR-551. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 6, 1995. *181 *182 *183 *184

20 F.3d 469 U.S.v.Restrepo NO. 92-04668 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 31, 1994 1 Appeal From: E.D.Tex. 2 AFFIRMED.

3 F.3d 442 U.S.v.Restrepo*** NO. 92-4763 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept 02, 1993 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2 AFFIRMED.

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 95-1660 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v.

986 F.2d 1462 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Carlos RESTREPO; Jorge Orrego; Carlos Andrade; JoseRincon; Aquilera Martinez; Alexander Lara;Moises Gomez; Omar Ospima, and AnaRuiz, Defendants,Jose Rivera, Defendant-Appellant. No. 700, Docket 92-1417. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Jan. 8, 1993.Decided Feb. 18, 1

87 F.3d 1330 U.S.v.Restrepo-Nunez* NO. 95-4881 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. June 03, 1996 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla., No. 94-00654-CR-LCN