Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Rincon-Castillo”
United States v. Gonzalespublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the appeal be and it hereby is DISMISSED. Roberto Castillo pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and crack, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and two counts of use of a firearm in relation to a narcotics offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Although the Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of
United States v. Castillopublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,
United States v. Loerapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ' James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Reconsider *1180Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order [Doc. 62] on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 35], filed March 8, 2016 (Doc. 109)(“Motion to Reconsider”). The Court
United States v. Kruegerpublic domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the district court’s order granting Defendant-Appellee Zachary Krueger’s motion to suppress evidence seized in Oklahoma pursuant to a warrant that was issued by a United States magistrate judge in Kansas. In granting Krueger’s motion, the district court concluded that suppression was necessary
United States v. Lopez-Velasquezpublic domain
568 F.3d 1139 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edmundo LOPEZ-VELASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-30241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 9, 2008. Filed June 23, 2009. *1140 Karin J. Immergut, Esq., United States Attorney, Johnathan S. Haub, Esq., K
United States v. Lopez-Velasquezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-30241 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.C. No. CR-06-00434-1-KI EDMUNDO LOPEZ-VELASQUEZ, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. App
United States v. Garcia-Morenopublic domain
626 F.Supp.2d 826 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, v. Andres GARCIA-MORENO, aka Roberto Barcall-Andrade, et al., Defendant. No. 1:08-cr-10123. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division. June 3, 2009. *827 James W. Powell, U.S. Attorney's Office, Jackson, TN, for Plaintiff. ORDER GRANTING DEFEN
United States v. Tashbookpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Robert Jay Tashbook challenges his conviction and sentence resulting from various charges of attempted and actual unlawful sexual conduct with minors. Specifically, Tashbook was charged with various violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422(b), 2423(a), 2251(a), and *6132252(a)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
United States v. Enrique Navapublic domain
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge: Today we once again hold that an individual is not arrested but merely detained when, at the border, he is asked to exit his vehicle, briefly handcuffed while escorted to the security office, uncuffed, patted down, and required to wait while his vehicle is searched.
United States v. Mitchellpublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 00-1366 ROBERT MITCHELL, III, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. No. 00-1520 LAWRENCE JOHN SPOSATO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
United States v. Jacksonpublic domain
199 F.Supp.2d 1081 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Kevin Scott JACKSON, Darren Michael Jackson, Defendants. No. 01-40035-01/02-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 20, 2002. *1082 *1083 James A. Brown, Office of United States Attorney, Topeka, KS, for Plaintiff.</
United States v. Wrightpublic domain
156 F.Supp.2d 1218 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Johnny Shane WRIGHT, et al., Defendants. Nos. 00-40024-02-SAC, 00-40024-03-SAC, 00-40024-06-SAC, 00-40024-10-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 26, 2001. *1219 *1220 Tricia A. Barr, Overland Park, KS, pro se.
United States v. Carrillopublic domain
123 F.Supp.2d 1223 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Manuel Guillermo CARRILLO, a/k/a "Psycho," a/k/a "Memo," Hector Hinojosa Gonzalez, a/k/a "Hector Hinojosa," a/k/a "Antonio Rameroz," a/k/a "Manuel Gonzalez," Raul Atayde, a/k/a "Bam Bam," Andres Jaquin Luna III, a/k/a "Buddha," Emiliano Zapata Licon, a/k/a "Zap," Roger Jiron, Juan Castorena, a/k/a "Chuco," Augustine Olivas, a/k/a "Chucky," Oscar Pacheco-Vasquez, a/k/a "Loco," Jose
McWILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. On July 15,1999, an indictment was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado naming Robert Mitchell, III (“Mitchell”), Lawrence John Sposa-to (“Sposato”), Richard Andrada (“Andra-da”) and six others as defendants (we are not here concerned with the other defendants). In Count 1, all defendants were charged with consp
United States v. Barriospublic domain
994 F.Supp. 1257 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Mauro A. BARRIOS, Ramiro Rojas-Cabral, Ronald Eenhuis, Santos Rojas, Efrain Gallegos, Alfredo Paiz, Arturo Rojas-Cabral, Cristobal Rojas, Genaro Rivera, Jose Angel Gutierrez, David Arciniega-Barcenas, Juan Rodriguez-Guarado, Nelson Cordova, and Meli (LNU) last name unknown, Defendants. Crim. No. 97-CR-173-B. United States District Court, D
United States v. Borrayo-Gutierrezpublic domain
119 F.Supp.2d 1168 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Juan Carlos BORRAYO-GUTIERREZ, a/k/a Carlos Borrayo, Jose Jesus Martinez, a/k/a Chuy, a/k/a Juan Rosario Gonzalez, Rafael De Leon-Gutierrez, a/k/a Rafa, a/k/a Fey, Cesar De Leon-Gutierrez, Nalvor Hector Ramirez, Gloria Ramirez-Encarnacion, Mary Ramirez, Pedro Trujillo-Valdez, Javier Lnu, a/k/a La Vaca, Robert Lee Abeyta, Mac Valdez, Kristi Lujan, Issac Lnu, a/k/a Aguado, Manuel Bal
United States v. Killingsworthpublic domain
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH JUN 30 1997 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
United States v. Gutierrez-Santimanpublic domain
ORDER SAM, Chief Judge. Before the court are Oppositions to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation filed by defendants Sergio Gutierrez-Santiman, Jorge Mesa-Garcia1, and Jose Torres Romero. By these documents, defendants object to a Report and Recommendation signed by the magistrate judge on August 19, 1997. Specifically, all three defendants object to the findings in the Repo
United States v. Shonubipublic domain
895 F.Supp. 460 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, v. Charles O. SHONUBI, Defendant. No. CR 92-0007. United States District Court, Eastern District of New York. August 4, 1995. *461 *462 Zachary W. Carter, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY (Karen A. Popp, Assista
United States v. Castillo-Garciapublic domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. After obtaining and executing five separate but related telephone wiretapping orders, the government secured evidence sufficient to indict eighteen members of an alleged drug conspiracy. In a pre-trial order, however, the district court suppressed all evidence obtained pursuant to four of the five wiretapping orders, on the grounds that the government had