Cases

Case: 23-60468 Document: 76-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/26/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 26, 2024

PER CURIAM: Gary Wesley Ritchey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The denial of his § 2255 motion is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(

OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Christopher Ritchey appeals his sentence of fifteen years in prison pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), based on several prior convictions of a Michigan breaking and entering statute, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.110. This appeal requires us to address the Supreme Court’s recent decision in

PER CURIAM: Trevor J. Ritchey appeals from the sentence imposed on May 16, 1991 by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, J.) upon his plea of guilty to one count of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). A. On October 29, 1990, the 19-year-old appellant entered a bank in Rotter

[Cite as State v. Ritchey, 2023-Ohio-1625.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2022-G-0025 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas GAIL M. RITCHEY,

Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.

Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Leben, J.: *530 Topeka police officers arrested Linda Ritchey for an *531 outstanding warrant while she was sitting in the front passenger seat of a parked van. After Ritchey was arrested, a

In re Ritchey, No. 659-7-15 Cncv (Mello, J., Nov. 17, 2016). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CHITTENDEN UNIT C

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING THE DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONS *852 AGAINST DUCTWORKS, INC. 1 AND PATRICK DOZARK FOR VIOLATION OF THE DISCHARGE INJUNCTION FOR COLLECTION OF DEBT [Doc. No. 34] JEFF BOHM, Chief Judge. I.Introducti

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Motion of respondent for damages denied. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. SCHELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 13, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was en

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Chicago is a major destination city for illegal drugs originating in Central and South America. Interstate 55, which runs from LaPlace, Louisiana, to Chicago, is •part ■ of the network of north-south and west-east highways used by drug dealers to deliver their illegal drugs to the Windy City. See, e.g., National Drug Intelligence Center, National

*686 DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge. Ritchey was convicted of refusing to report for and submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States in violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 462(a). We affirm. Ritchey was classified 1-A by his local board on January 17, 1967. He does not attack t

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Donna Rhea was the beneficiary of an employee benefit plan organized under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Rhea suffered injuries from medical malpractice. The plan covered some of her medical expenses. After she settled the malpractice claim, the plan sought re

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-2109 ___________ Derald Richey, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

OPINION & ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Brickman Group Ltd., LLC’s (“Brickman”) Motion to Certify Interlocutory Appeal and Stay Proceedings (Doc. 26).1 This motion requests an order permitting an immediate appeal of this Court’s November 21, 2011, Order (Doc. 25) denying Brickman’s Motion for Reconsiderati