Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Rivera-Paredes”
Rivera-Paredes v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Anderson v. United Statespublic domain
MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm. Background In a March 20
United States v. Riverapublic domain
MEMORANDUM** Eduardo Rivera appeals from a condition of supervised release imposed following his guilty-plea conviction to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. *555Rivera contends that the district court erred by including a condition of supervised rele
United States v. Moralespublic domain
Case: 24-20088 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/09/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED December 9, 2024
United States v. Sanchez-Laureanopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 20-1240, 20-1275, 20-1276, 20-1283, 20-1287, 21-1641 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. LUIS DANIEL RAMOS-BAEZ, a/k/a Danny Power; EDUARDO ROSARIO-ORANGEL, a/k/a Barba, a/k/a Cholon; AVELINO MILLÁN-MACHUCA, a/k/a El Fuerte, a/k/a Viejo, a/k/a Gordo; LUIS H. QUIÑONES-SANTIAGO, a/k/a Hiram; JUAN J. CL
United States v. Simpsonpublic domain
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. Based on a confidential informant’s report that Mr. Simpson had drugs and guns, law enforcement officers obtained a search warrant for his house. The search revealed cocaine, firearms, and ammunition, and a jury later found Mr. Simpson guilty on 13 counts: • Count 1: Possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2012);
United States v. Zapata-Cortinaspublic domain
ORLANDO L. GARCIA, Chief United States District Judge On this day, the Court considered Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (docket no. 23) (the "Motion to Dismiss") and the Government's Motion to Reconsider the Court's Order Dismissing the Indictment (docket no. 31) (the "Motion to Reconsider"). After reviewing the motions and each party's original and supplemental briefing, the Court finds that the Government's Motion to Reco
United States v. Paredespublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR SENTENCE Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction ... 288 II. Facts ... 289 A. Offense Conduct ... 289 B. New York State DWAI ... 290 III. Procedural History ... 290 IV. Law ... 291
United States v. Israel Martinezpublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: After a months-long investigation into hiring practices at Waste Management Incorporated ("WMI"), the Government charged Defendant-Appellant Israel Arguimides Martinez and several co-defendants with various immigration crimes stemming from their participation in efforts to recruit and retain undocumented immigrants for employment at WMI in Houston, Texas. M
United States v. Passos-Paterninapublic domain
CYR, Circuit Judge. The five defendants were discovered in highly incriminating proximity to a half ton of cocaine aboard the vessel SHEME on the high seas off Puerto Rico a few months before they were tried and convicted under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act. Their appeals raise a surfeit of issues fathoming the sufficiency of the evidence and the fairness of their trials. As we see no insufficiency and no unfairnes
United States v. Naranjo-Rosariopublic domain
MCCONNELL, District Judge. Leonel Naranjo-Rosario (Naranjo) was convicted of several drug and gun offenses and was sentenced to 188 months in prison. Mr. Naranjo argues on appeal that the district court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on three counts of the indictment; it erred in admitting the testimony of the handler of a narcotics-d
United States v. Dupreepublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATSUMOTO, District Judge: INTRODUCTION The government charges defendants Courtney Dupree (“Dupree”) and Thomas Foley (“Foley”) with various counts of Bank Fraud, Making a False Statement, and Conspiracy to Commit Bank, Mail, and Wire Fraud. Presently before the court are the government’s motions in limine to admit and preclude certai
United States v. Cisnero Paredes-Reyespublic domain
OMNIBUS ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are several matters, to wit: (a) Motion to Suppress filed by defendant Cisnero Paredes Reyes (“Paredes-Reyes”) on April 24, 2013, Docket No. 115; (b) Report and Recommendation issued by the United States Magistrate Judge Camille Vélez Rivé (“U.S. Magistrate Judge”) on May 15, 2013, Docket No. 127; (c) Motion for
United States v. Monteiropublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 07-1215 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANGELO BRANDAO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Brandaopublic domain
539 F.3d 44 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Angelo BRANDAO, Defendant, Appellant. No. 07-1215. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard May 8, 2008. Decided August 21, 2008. *46 Gordon W. Spencer with whom Carol Mallory was on brief for appellant. Michael A. Rotker, Attorney, U.S.
United States v. Mangual-Santiagopublic domain
562 F.3d 411 (2009) UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Walter MANGUAL-SANTIAGO, Defendant, Appellant. No. 07-1912. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard October 27, 2008. Decided April 17, 2009. *417 Rafael Castro Lang, for appellant. Desireé Laborde-Sanfiorenzo, Assistant United States Attorney, w
United States v. Saneauxpublic domain
365 F.Supp.2d 488 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Samuel SANEAUX and Rafael Estrella, Defendants. No. S203CR.781(CSH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 1, 2005. Michael F. Dailey, Kuczinski, Vila, Tarallo, Pillinger & Miller, LLP, Elmsford, NY, Robert J. Lunney, Lunney & Murtagh, LLC, White Plains, NY, Gustavo L. Vila, Kuczinski Vila &am;
United States v. Ramospublic domain
346 F.Supp.2d 567 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, v. Gustavo RAMOS, Amado Rudy Feliz-Ramirez, a/k/a "Cable," Carlos Ramos-Valenzuela, Jorge Omar Garcia-Martinez, Juan Ramos-Breach, Jorge Hernandez, Carlos Breach-Vega, Jesus Vaca-Acosta, a/k/a "Chaco," Danillo Paredes-Silva, a/k/a "Dadao," Polman Tavares, a/k/a "Harry," Adalberto Ortiz, a/k/a "Capu," Cesar Santana, a/k/a "Sandy," a/k/a "Raton," and Martin Aldez-Solis, Defendants.
Alicea-Torres v. United Statespublic domain
455 F.Supp.2d 32 (2006) Eduardo ALICEA-TORRES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. Civil No. 05-1544(DRD). Crim. No. 97-076(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 29, 2006. *33 *34 *35 *3
United States v. Jones, Tommypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-1489 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOMMY E. JONES, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District