Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mauro Alejandro Haro-Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Haro-Torres has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1057 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ELVINS SYLVESTRE, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Mark G. Mastroianni, U.S. District Judge]

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, AMENDED OPINION *

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2904 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Salvador Magana Madrigal, Jr. Defendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 23-3768 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1077 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CARLOS MIGUEL CONCEPCION-GULIAM, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1747 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. ÁNGEL RAMOS-CARRERAS, Appellant, Defendant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge] Before

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1243 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. SANTOS CASTILLO-TORRES, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge]

17-2894 United States v. Lobo 17-2894 USA v. Lobo In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term, 2018 (Argued: August 23, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018) Docket No. 1

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1781 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Pedro Zambrano, also known as Peter Rivera, also known as JR Acevedo, al

450 F.3d 1059 Anthony K. HART, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Bernard PARKS, Chief of Police; Marc Zavala; Robert Rivera; Daryl McLemore, Defendants-Appellees.Anthony K. Hart, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Bernard Parks, Chief of Police; David Kalish; Marc Zavala; Robert Rivera; Manny Avila; Ron Sanchez; Robert Rehme; Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences; James D. Staley; Bruce E. Davis, Defendants-Appellees. No.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1607 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. HÉCTOR MALDONADO-MALDONADO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. María Antongiorgi-Jordán, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 17-1098 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. SANTOS DANIEL RONDÓN-GARCÍA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge]

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. In this sentencing appeal, the Defendant-Appellant Santos Daniel Rondón-García ("Rondón") insists that his eighteen-month sentence is both procedurally and substantively unreasonable. After careful review, we affirm. I. Background As this appeal concerns the imposition of the defendant's sentence, we briefly summarize the relevant facts and charted

COFFIN, Chief Judge. The sole issue presented in this case is whether the district court abused its discretion in dismissing plaintiffs suit for want of prosecution. On June 6, 1975, plaintiffs Eduardo Zavala Santiago and Juan A. Rivera Cosme, instituted an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which they alleged that defendants, the mayor and municipality of Arecibo, had discharged

HOWARD, Chief Judge. Sihai Cheng challenges the reasonableness of the 108-month incarcerative sen-fence he received for his role in an illicit scheme to export pressure transducers— sensitive goods with nuclear applications— from.the United States to Iran through the People’s Republic of China. We affirm. I. Between 2009 and 2011

HOWARD, Chief Judge. José Ramón González-Rodríguez (“Gon-zález”) challenges the reasonableness of his 33-month incarcerative sentence for possession of a machine gun in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(o) and 924(a)(2). After careful consideration, we affirm. I. In August 2015, the Puerto Rico Police Department (“PRPD”) executed a search warrant on a residence in Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, aft