Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before DALY, KISOR, and HARRELL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Connor E. ROBBINS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: In August 2011, after traveling from New York to Nevada, defendant-appellant Nathan Robbins knowingly failed to update his registration as a sex offender, as he was required to do under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 42 U.S.C. § 16913. He subsequently pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a), which makes it a crime for

759 F.Supp.2d 815 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Ronnie L. ROBBINS, Defendant. Case No. 2:10CR00006. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia. January 3, 2011. *816 Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, VA, for the United States. R. Wayne Austin, Scyphers & Austin, P.C., Abingdon, VA, for D

785 F.Supp.2d 552 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Ronnie L. ROBBINS, Defendant. Case No. 2:10CR00006. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Big Stone Gap Division. May 22, 2011. *554 Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, VA, for the United States. R. Wayne Austin, Scyphers & Austin, P.C.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * MONROE G. McKAY, Circuit Judge. Appellant Lee E. Robbins was convicted by a jury of fifteen counts of tax fraud. In this direct criminal appeal, Mr. Robbins challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for severance, the adequacy of the verdict form, the calculation of tax loss for sentencing purposes, and the imposition of costs of prosecution.

CARVER, Senior Judge: A military judge, sitting as a special court-martial, convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of three specifications of unauthorized absence, violation of a lawful general order by inhaling the gaseous contents of a computer duster to achieve intoxication, wrongful use of cocaine, wrongful use of marijuana on about 40 occasions, and five specifications of wrongful distribution of marijuana, in

Judge EFFRON delivered the opinion of the Court. A general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone convicted appellant, *456 contrary to his pleas, of 2 specifications of sodomy with a child under the age of 16 year

SULLIVAN, Judge (concurring in the result): I agree with the majority that appellant’s conviction of violating Article 134, UCMJ, 10 USC § 934, by unlawfully terminating his wife’s pregnancy may be affirmed in part. However, I cannot logically or legally distinguish this case from Lewis v. United States, 523 U.S. 155, 118 S.Ct. 1135,140 L.Ed.2d 271 (19

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. I. Defendant Harvey Frank Robbins purchased the High Island Ranch in Hamilton Dome, Wyoming, in 1994. Prior to that date, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) obtained an easement across the ranch from Defendant’s predecessor in interest. The agency, however, failed to record the easement. ' Thus, the easement was not enforceable a

OPINION OF THE COURT SNYDER, Senior Judge: The primary issue we decide in this case is whether the Ohio fetal homicide statute may be prosecuted as a violation of Article 134, UCMJ, via the federal Assimilative Crimes Act (ACA), 18 U.S.C. § 13. We hold, yes. Appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, pursuant to his pleas, of committing a battery on

163 F.3d 1358 U.S.v.Robbins NO. 95-5541 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. November 20, 1998Rehearing Denied Jan. 20, 1999. Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No.93-00138-CR-NCR 1 Affirmed.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3360 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Matthew Barrett Robbins Defen

819 F.Supp. 672 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Patricia A. ROBBINS, a/k/a Patricia A. Doyle, Defendant. Civ. A No. 92-40347-FL. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D., at Flint. April 22, 1993. *673 Sheridan V. Holzman, Southfield, MI, for plaintiff. Juliet L. McCracken, UAW-GM Legal Services Pla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IVA ROBBINS, Plaintiff, v. Casea No. 24-cv-1156 (CRC) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se plaintiff Iva Robbins filed this lawsuit against the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), former Post

875 F.2d 857 U.S.v.Robbins NO. 88-1518 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. APR 17, 1989 1 Appeal From: E.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED.

985 F.2d 569 U.S.v.Robbins (Melvin) NO. 91-1364 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Jan 08, 1992 1 Appeal From: E.D.Mo. 2 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.