Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. Action No. 15-0096 (1) (ABJ) ) LAMONT DELRICO ROBERTS, ) ) Defendant.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge On November 18, 2016, defendant Lamont Delrico Roberts was sentenced to seventy-two months of incarceration after his plea of guilty to unlawful distribution of twenty-eight grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B)(iii). See

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jason Paul Roberts raises issues that are foreclosed by United States v. Schofield, 802 F.3d 722 (5th Cir. 2015). In Schofield, 802 F.3d at 729-31, we held that a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1470 qualified as a sex offense for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration Notification Act (SORNA) and that SORNA’s residual clause

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT BRUBAKER, Chief Judge: The United States petitions this court for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. It seeks relief from a lower court ruling finding evidence of general military character admissible, directly at odds with the recently-amended Military Rule of Evidenoe 404, Manual

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Luden Antonio Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

ORDER Donte Roberts was sentenced in 1998 to a total of 860 months’ imprisonment on his convictions for trafficking crack cocaine. The district court granted Roberts’ motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and reduced that term to 294 months, though his appointed lawyer had argued for 236 months. Roberts has filed a notice of appeal, but counsel asserts that the appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw on the basis of Anders v. Califo

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. • PER CURIAM: Prentis Trewayne Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion and his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. The orders are not appeal-able unless a Circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabil

ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) [Doc. 38] and Defendant’ Objections to the R & R [Doc. 41]. The Magistrate Judge’s R & R recommended that Defendant Roberts’ Motions to Suppress Statements and Evidence [Does. 11 and 12] be granted in part and denied in part.

*629Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lucien Antonio Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IN PART AND GRANTING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IN PART MICHAEL R. MURPHY, Circuit Judge. ORDER On June 27, 2012, the court issued an Order Denying a Certificate of Appeala-bility in connection with this matter. On July 6, 2012, the Appellant filed a pleading with the clerk of the co

MEMORANDUM KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. This dam case involves claims by the United States that Defendants’ creation of an earthen dam and its consequent impoundment of water violates the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. Defendants have filed Motions in Limine regarding the proffered expert testimony of Rodney R. Knight (Docket No. 68); Richard D. Martin (Docket No. 71

660 F.3d 149 (2011) United States of America, Appellee, v. O'Neal ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 10-1230-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: May 20, 2011. Decided: September 29, 2011. *152 Stephanie M. Carvlin, Law Office of Stephanie M. Carvlin, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appel

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In this case we consider whether application of the career offender provision found in Chapter Four of the Sentencing Guidelines is an “adjustment” as such term is contemplated by the Guidelines and, by *249implication, the plea agreement entered into between the government and Roberts. See U.S. Sentencing Gui

612 F.3d 306 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Michael David ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Major Harrison Booth, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 09-50067, 09-50186. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 13, 2010. *308 Joseph H. Gay, J

696 F.Supp.2d 263 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. O'Neal ROBERTS, Defendant. No. 07-CR-425 (DLI). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 11, 2010. *265 Walter M. Norkin, Brendan G. King, Shreve Ariail, United States Attorneys Office Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY, for Plaintiff. Grego

MEMORANDUM ** Jimmy Lowell Roberts appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 100-month sentence for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 *601L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Roberts’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

MEMORANDUM ** Jimmy Lowell Roberts appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 100-month sentence for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 *601L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Roberts’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Samuel Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United Sta

Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court. Staff Sergeant Christopher J. Roberts pleaded guilty to one specification of assault consummated by a battery upon his wife (ER) and not guilty to the following three specifications: a separate assault consummated by a battery upon ER; the rape of ER; and communicating a threat to ER. A military judge sitting

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Samuel Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United Sta