Cases

PER CURIAM: * Juan Antonio Rodriguez-Medina appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. He contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felon/’ provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Alternatively, he contends that he may not be convicted a

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

BESOSA, District Judge. Plaintiff Norberto Medina-Rodriguez ("Medina") commenced this action on May 19, 2017, alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Docket Nos. 1 & 27; see 42 U.S.C. §§ 1201 et seq. Defendants Farmacia Medina, Inc. and Farmacia M

PER CURIAM: * Emilio Medina-Rodriguez (Medina) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 24 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment. Medina argues for the first time on appeal that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 62

MESKILL, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Tommy Cruz was convicted of possession with intent to distribute heroin following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Ross, J. Cruz now appeals from that judgment. He contends that he was wrongfully convicted on an aiding and abetting theory after the district court

125 F.3d 863 97 CJ C.A.R. 2257 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOE MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ, AKA No. 19-72681 Eloy Medina-Rodriguez, AKA Noe Rodrigues-Medina, Agency No. Petitioner, A041-848-597 v. OPINION WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Pet

OPINION AND ORDER1 BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is defendants Fernandez Bakery, Inc. (“Bakery”) and Juan Fernandez-Ramirez’s (“Fernandez”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”). Plaintiff Norberto Medina-Rodriguez (“Medina”) brought this action against defendants alleging violations of Title III of the Americans wi

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

SUMMARY ORDER This consolidated appeal involves the sentencing of four Defendants-Appellants, Leanda Perry, Luis Gonzalez, Antwan Tann, and Benigno Malave, for their involvement in a conspiracy to possess and distribute crack and powder cocaine in and around Meriden, Connecticut. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case, and the issues presented on this appeal. Perry pled g

SUMMARY ORDER This consolidated appeal involves the sentencing of four Defendants-Appellants, Leanda Perry, Luis Gonzalez, Antwan Tann, and Benigno Malave, for their involvement in a conspiracy to possess and distribute crack and powder cocaine in and around Meriden, Connecticut. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case, and the issues presented on this appeal. Perry pled g

547 F.3d 66 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Warren HAWKINS, also known as Paul, also known as Hawk, Defendant-Appellee, Alex Luna, Nicky Carrasquilla, also known as Nicky Gomez, Jose R. Adames, also known as Ponpa, also known as Pon, also known as Pong, Nelson Rosa, also known as Pee Wee, Bobby Medina, also known as Mr. B., Alex Salcedo, Juan Rodriguez, also known as Juan G, also known as Juan Prosser, also known as John Prosse

754 F.Supp.2d 336 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. Danny GUZMAN-CORREA [6], et al., Defendants. CR. No. 07-290 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 5, 2010. *337 Jose Capo-Iriarte, United States Attorneys' Office, Hato Rey, PR, for Plaintiff. Fernando J. Carlo-Gorbea, Fernando J. Carlo

733 F.Supp.2d 248 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wilfredo ROSARIO-CAMACHO [4], Luis Rodriguez-Sostre [5], Josue Perez-Mercado [10], Ramon Maysonet-Soler [14], Jose Negron-Sostre [18], Defendants. Criminal No. 08-310 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 22, 2010. *253 Isabel Munoz-Acosta, Olga

NUMBER 13-25-00509-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ALMA RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. JUDY ANNE TORRES AND LEVI MEDINA, Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM THE 445TH DISTRICT COURT

BOUDIN and STAHL, Circuit Judges, concurring. Although we concur in the result and in most of what our colleague has written, our reasons differ from his in rejecting one of the principal claims of error. Among other claims raised on appeal, Lorenzo Catalán-Roman (“Catalán”) challenges the district court’s exclusion of testimony from FBI agents that he contends would have impeached Eluber Torres-Alejandro’

MEMORANDUM** We have reviewed the record and the opening brief and conclude that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The United States Su*613preme Court’s decision in AlmendarezTorres v.

697 F.Supp.2d 244 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wilfredo ROSARIO-CAMACHO, Luis Rodriguez-Sostre, Josue Perez-Mercado, Ramon Maysonet-Soler, Jose Negron-Sostre, Defendants. Criminal No. 08-310 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 22, 2010. David Ramos-Pagan, Jorge L. Armenteros-Chervoni, San Juan, PR, for Defendant Jose Rodrigue

PER CURIAM. Pro se appellant Marcos Martlnez-Medi-na appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For reasons given below, we affirm. On appeal, Martinez also raises new claims, which are outside the scope of the certificate of appealability (COA) granted by the district court. As to such claims, we deny a COA. We begin with background. I. Background<

430 F.3d 869 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ignacio MEDINA, Leslie Chambers, Thomas Ross, Gerald Pittman, Fidelmar Cortes, Jose Rodriguez, Waldemar Gonzalez, Marlon Regalado, and Juan Hernandez, Defendants-Appellants. No. 02-1700. No. 02-1796. No. 02-2232. No. 02-2246. No. 02-2252.