Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Rodriguez-Reina”
Reina-Rodriguez v. United Statespublic domain
655 F.3d 1182 (2011) Hector REINA-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-16676. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 9, 2011. Filed September 13, 2011. *1185 John M. Sands, Federal Public Defender, Christopher R. Kilburn, Brian
Reina-Rodriguez v. United Statespublic domain
645 F.3d 1129 (2011) Hector REINA-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-16676. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 9, 2011. Filed June 22, 2011. *1132 John M. Sands, Federal Public Defender, Lee Tucker, Christopher R. Kilburn,
United States v. Reina-Rodriguezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-10475 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-04-2415-TUC- HECTOR REINA-RODRIGUEZ, DCB Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court
United States v. Hector Reina-Rodriguezpublic domain
OPINION ROGER T. BENITEZ, District Judge. [I] Hector Reina-Rodriguez (“Reina-Rodriguez”) appeals his sentence of fifty- *1150 one months imprisonment following a conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that application
Duenez Gutierrez v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (
Duenez Gutierrez v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (
United States v. Martinezpublic domain
McLAUGHLIN, Senior Circuit Judge: BACKGROUND In August 1992, Alejandro Martinez was arrested for conspiring to distribute cocaine. Almost immediately after his arrest, Martinez began cooperating with the government. On September 2, 1992, Martinez signed an agreement with the government in which he agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine. He also agreed to assist in the pros
United States v. Martinezpublic domain
151 F.3d 68 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Alejandro MARTINEZ, also known as Alejandro Martinez-Garcia;Jose De Jesus Zapata-Herrera, also known as El Chino, alsoknown as Jose Mario Perez; Nelson Aybar; Johnny Aybar;Felix Hernandez; Jose Miguel Rodriguez; Michael R.Williams; Margarita Hernandez; Francisco Bolivar; andHolguer Miguel Garay, also known as Luis Alicia Reina, Defendants,Milagros Angeles; Rafa
United States v. David Payopublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 19-1631 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DAVID PAYO, Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (District Court No. 2:17-cr-00211-001) District Judge: Honorable Mark R. Hornak
United States v. Cozadpublic domain
Appellate Case: 20-3233 Document: 010110626415 Date Filed: 01/03/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit January 3, 2022 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
Ernst v. United Statespublic domain
AIKEN, Judge: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, petitioner Daniel Carl Ernst, a federal prisoner, moves to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. He argues that his sentence was based on a mandatory minimum that was erroneously applied to him and that his trial and sentence violated his rights under the United Sta
United States v. Joshua Cooleypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-30022 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:16-cr-00042- SPW-1 JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY, Defendant-Appellee. ORDER Fil
United States v. Kennedypublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S § 2255 MOTION AND DENYING GOVERNMENT’S RENEWED MOTION TO STAY: TIME SENSITIVE ORDER (ECF Nos. 23, 32) Lawrence J. O’Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Petitioner Corbin James Kennedy’s (“Petitioner” or “Kennedy”) motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 2
United States v. Savagepublic domain
PROCEEDINGS (in chambers): Order Denying Habeas Motion (CV #1 and CR #27) for Lack of Merit; Directing Entry of Separate Final Judgment; Directing Separate Certificate of Appealability Ruling; Terminating and Closing the Civil Case HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Represented by counsel, federal prisoner James Lewis Savage (“petitioner”) initiated this action for a wri
United States v. Tomisserpublic domain
EDWARD F. SHEA, Senior United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Adam Michael Tomisser’s Motion to Vacate Sen-*1171tenee and for Immediate Resentencing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF No. 73. On July 6, 2016, the Court held a hearing on this matter. Ms. Alison Guernsey appeared on behalf of Mr. Tomisser, who was not present for the hearing. ECF
United States v. Walkerpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING § 2255 MOTION CLAUDIA WILKEN, United States District Judge Movant Tommy Lee Walker, represented by counsel, moves under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. Respondent has filed an opposition to the motion and Movant has filed a reply. Having considered all of the papers filed by the parties and the record in this case, the Court will GRANT the motion.
United States v. Garciapublic domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE Re: ECF No. 58 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Heri Garcia’s motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF No. 58. On July 13, 2016, the Court granted Defendant’s motion, ECF No. 73, and scheduled a re-sentencing hearing for August 26, 2016, ECF No. 74. This order sets forth the reasonin
Carpio v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER GRANTING PETITION JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is Petitioner Rogelio Carpio’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his 70-month prison sentence in the wake of the Su-*1186prerae Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —
Pressley v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT A SENTENCE Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s “Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody” (Dkt. # 1). After considering the motion, answer, reply, and supplemental authority, the Court grants the motion
United States v. Cloudpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE ***U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE ACTION REQUIRED*** ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, United States District Judge BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Sentence in Light of Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), ECF No. 76. The Court has reviewed the motion, the response memorandum (EC