Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Javier Garibay Mendoza-Romero appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.- § 1291, and we affirm. Mendoza-Romero first argues that th

OPINION RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: Joseph Haaron Romero-Mendoza (Romero) petitions this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal. The BIA found that Romero was removable pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) because he had committed a crime of violence and failed to establish entitlement to rel

807 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Juan Manuel ACOSTA, Martin Arreola-Romero, Angel Luis Ayala, Otha Barnes, Gerald Edward Durrance, Martina Casas Flores, Ramiro Hernandez-Duque, Jorge Lucatero-Torres, Belisario Gil Mendoza, Juan Manuel Mendoza, Raphael Pedroza Perez, Obiel Pineda-Pardo, Alfonso Rios, Jr., Jose Cesar Almeida, Jorge Alejandro Anaya-Medina, Luis Manuel Haces-Delgado, Alejandro De La Cruz-Plancarte, Javier De La

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 117); (95 Fed. Appx. 606); (93 Fed. Appx. 663); (95 Fed. Appx. 118); (95 Fed. Appx. 582); (95 Fed. Appx. 629); (95 Fed. Appx. 661); (95 Fed. Appx. 662); (95 Fed. Appx. 630); (95 Fed. Appx. 645); (92 Fed. Appx. 990); (95 Fed. Appx. 631); <

Appellate Case: 24-7019 Document: 53-1 Date Filed: 07/29/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 29, 2025

Appellate Case: 23-2190 Document: 51 Date Filed: 03/11/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 11, 2025

Case: 23-60468 Document: 76-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/26/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 26, 2024

*939(Reported below: 10 Fed. Appx. 608); *940(13 Fed. Appx. 541); (20 Fed. Appx. 609); C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

544 U.S. 1014 DE LA CRUZ-GONZALEZv.UNITED STATESLOPEZ-CRUZv.UNITED STATESARAGUZ-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATESCANTU-RIOSv.UNITED STATESCASTILLO-BUSTAMANTE, AKA GARCIAv.UNITED STATESMENDOZA-SIFUENTESv.UNITED STATESTORRES-AVILAv.UNITED STATESHERNANDEZ-GONZALEZv.UNITED STATESVELA-SALINASv.UNITED STATESNIEVES-ALVAREZv.UNITED STATESRAMIREZ-SAN

Appellate Case: 22-5017 Document: 010110825891 Date Filed: 03/14/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 14, 2023

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50240 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00702- v. ODW-2 VIVIAN TAT, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of C

Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT (the "Motion") (ECF No. 13), which for the following reasons, will be denied. BACKGROUND I. Procedural Context Erlin Torres Zuniga ("Torres")1 was charged in a one-count indictment with ill

Saris, C.J. *174INTRODUCTION Defendant Adilson Barbosa moves to dismiss the indictment charging him with illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Relying on Pereira v. Sessi

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4256 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TREY CARDALE CAMPBELL, Defendant – Appellant. . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:19-

Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge Before the Court is defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment [Dkt No. 22]. For the reasons stated in open court and further developed in this Memorandum Opinion, defendant's motion has been denied.1 I. Aristides Rivera Lopez, also known as Aristides Lopez Rivera ("defendant"),2 is a citizen

Richard W. Goldberg, Senior Judge Arguing that the Immigration Judge that ordered him removed lacked jurisdiction to conduct his removal proceedings, Defendant moves to dismiss the Indictment charging him with illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Defendant asserts that the Government cannot meet its burden as i