Cases

Appellate Case: 23-1278 Document: 113-1 Date Filed: 09/08/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 8, 2025

Case: 21-30739 Document: 164-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 21-30739 M

PER CURIAM. As a condition of his supervised release, Rudolph George Stanko was required to complete a PosNConviction Risk Assessment (PCRA) form given to him by his probation officer. The form instructed Stanko to respond, using a four-point scale ranging from “strongly agree” to “disagree,” to questions that had little relevance to the offenses he had been convicted of,

OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Defendant Rudolph Jackson conditionally pled guilty to the charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), reserving the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the firearm discovered in the vehicle he was driving. On appeal, he challeng

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1399 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Rudolph Geor

MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is before the court on defendant’s “Application for Review and Appeal of Magistrate Judge’s Order of July 9, 2004[,] Denying the Defendant’s Motion for Preservation and In Camera Inspection and/or Discovery of Rough Interview Notes,”1 and the government’s response.2 Defendant’s original motion sought not only an order direc

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ________________ No. 06-3157 ________________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Rudolph Stanko appeals his convictions for two counts of possessing firearms and ammunition by a prohibited person, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On appeal, Stanko’s primary argument is that the district court1 erred in concluding that Stan-ko qualifies as a prohibited person under § 922(g)(1) because his 1984 conviction for violating the Federal Meat Inspection

BARKETT, Circuit Judge: Rudolph Wilson appeals his 63-month sentence imposed after pleading guilty to illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Wilson argues that the district court erred by imposing a sixteen-point enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), because his prior conviction for aggravated child abuse does not qualify as a

*728 BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Rudolph Olguin was convicted by a jury of distributing a controlled substance, Oxy-codone, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). He appeals his conviction, arguing that the District Court 1 erred in instructing

308 F.3d 557 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rudolph KESZTHELYI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 00-6630. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 12, 2002. Decided and Filed: October 17, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Paul

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Rudolph Weaver appeals his armed robbery conviction on the grounds that the jury pool in the Erie Division of the Western District of Pennsylvania, from which the jury that convicted him was chosen, did not reflect a fair cross section of the community as required by the Sixth Amendment and the Jury Service an

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-1710 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v.

28 F.3d 115 U.S.v.Rudolph* NO. 92-2112 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. July 08, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Fla. 2

39 F.3d 323 U.S.v.Rudolph* NO. 92-2112 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Oct 25, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Fla. 2

OPINION COLE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Rudolph McClellan appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following revocation of his term of supervised release. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for resentencing. I. In 1994, McClellan entered a

USCA11 Case: 21-12828 Document: 51-1 Date Filed: 02/12/2024 Page: 1 of 24 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12828 & No. 22-10135 ____________________ ERIC ROBERT RUDOLPH,

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: Section 3E1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG) instructs: (a) If the defendant clearly demonstrates acceptance of responsibility for his offense, decrease the offense level by 2 levels. Id. at § 3El.l(a) (1994). Effective Novem

OPINION OF THE COURT JOHNSON, Senior Judge: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of two specifications of rape, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for fifteen years, forfeiture of $624.20 pay per month

48 F.3d 1217NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rudolph Owen CHEATHAM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-7125. United States Co