Cases

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. In 86-5222, Dr. Paul D. Rue, a sole practitioner of dentistry, appeals from the District Court’s1 order and judgment enforcing an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) summons to produce certain records and documents pertaining to Dr. Rue’s dentistry practice for purposes of an IRS civil tax audit. In 86-5353, Dr. Rue appeals from the District Court’s subsequent order and judgme

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

BRORBY, Circuit Judge. Mr. Rue appeals his sentence asserting the district court erred when it applied United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, § 2A2.2 (Nov. 1991) (hereinafter U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2) — Aggravated Assault, instead of U.S.S.G. § 2A2.4— Obstructing or Impeding Officers (1991). We affirm. The basic facts are ess

979 F.Supp. 968 (1997) THOMAS DE LA RUE AG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES BANKNOTE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 94 Civ. 7925(MGC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 19, 1997. *969 Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, New York City by David G. Keyko, Peter D.C. Mason, Takemi Ueno, for Plaintiff. Weil,

718 F.2d 1093 U. S.v.La Rue 83-6029 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 10/7/83 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED

[Cite as State v. Rue, 2019-Ohio-1720.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2018-T-0092 - vs - : LAMONT MAURICE R

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Twila Rue, appeals from a judgment and decree of divorce. She contends that the trial court erred in concluding that because she was in default for answer, the trial court was not obliged to consider testimony concerning the best interest of the children of the parties and could properly exclude her from participating in the proceedings. We agree. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and this cause is remanded for further p

538 F.2d 336 La Ruev.U. S. No. 74-2048 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 3/2/76 1 D.Nev. AFFIRMED

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Rue, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-6706.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or o

ELDON E. FALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this Order & Reasons, the Court considers sua sponte the applicable standard of care owed by an innkeeper to his guests. Having reviewed the considerable body of Louisiana law available to it, the Court rules as follows. I. BACKGROUND This case arises from injuries Plaintiff Kevin Phetteplace allegedly sustained while st

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

GERBER, Judge: This is a consolidated action involving seven former general partners of Goodbody & Co., a broker-dealer in securities and commodities. This action is for redetermination of deficiencies arising out of the financial collapse of the Goodbody partnership and the accession to its assets and liabilities by Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch). The issues for deci

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm. Background In a March 20

648 F.3d 251 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ted Russell Schwartz MURRAY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-20813. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 27, 2011. *252 James Lee Turner, Cedric La Rue Joubert (argued), Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Marjorie A. Meyers

603 F.2d 444 1979-2 Trade Cases 62,782, 4 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 734 UNITED STATES of Americav.CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC., Appellant in No. 78-2328.UNITED STATESv.CHASE BAG COMPANY, Appellant in No. 78-2330.UNITED STATESv.COOPER, James K., Appellant in No. 78-2331.UNITED STATESv.RUE, Harrison B., Appellant in No. 78-2332. Nos. 78-2328 and 78-2330 to 78-23

751 F.Supp.2d 323 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Christopher CUSTER. Criminal Action No. 04-10098-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 19, 2010. Nathaniel R. Mendell, Susan M. Poswistilo, Nancy Rue, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for United States of America. *324 REP