Cases

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-appellants Nana Sarpong and Attah Evans Kawesi appeal judgments of conviction entered, respectively, on March 13, 2007 and September 4, 2007, following their pleas of guilty to offenses arising from their participation in interrelated heroin conspiracies. The District Court sentenced Sarpong principally to a 292-month term of imprisonment and Kawesi principally to a 262-month term of imprisonment. We assume the

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-appellants Nana Sarpong and Attah Evans Kawesi appeal judgments of conviction entered, respectively, on March 13, 2007 and September 4, 2007, following their pleas of guilty to offenses arising from their participation in interrelated heroin conspiracies. The District Court sentenced Sarpong principally to a 292-month term of imprisonment and Kawesi principally to a 262-month term of imprisonment. We assume the

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Bernice Sarpong, a native and citizen of Ghana, seeks judicial review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her applications for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Concluding that the agency’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, we deny the petition.

Case: 20-1622 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 03/15/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TEJERE J. AKPENEYE, JONATHAN ALLEN, SAHR ALPHA-K, JACQUES V. ALSTON, RODOLFO ANCHETA, JR., WAYNE A. ANTOINE, CARL ASLAKEN, MICHAEL BAKER, ROCHELLE BANKS, JAMES BOUYER, JR., MAIA BRADLEY, GWENDOLYN BROWN, KEVIN L. BROWN, LORI O. BROWN, TRACY BROWN, GEORGE BURNS, SHAWN R. BUTTERFIELD, BRAD BYRNES, RYAN

Statement of Reasons Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §.3553(c)(2) . Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction ... 395 A. Instant Offense ,,. 395 *395B. Arrest .. .395 C. Guilty Plea ...395 H. Sentencing Hearing ... 395<

Statement of Reasons Pursuant ■■ to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2) Jack B. Weinsteiii, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction... 394 A. Offense.., 394 B. Guilty Plea... 395 C. Sentencing Hearing.;. 395 II. Offense Level, Category, and Sentencing Guidelines Range... 395

MEMORANDUM AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR SENTENCE Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction ... 288 II. Facts ... 289 A. Offense Conduct ... 289 B. New York State DWAI ... 290 III. Procedural History ... 290 IV. Law ... 291

Statement of Reasons for Sentencing Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2) Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction... 155 A. Instant Case.,. 155 B. Consistency in Sentencing... 156 II. Facts and Procedural History.. .156 A. Background.,. 156

Statement of Reasons for Sentencing Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2) JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 209 A. Varying Degrees of Culpability of Child Pornography Offenders.., 209 B. Consistency in Sentencing.. .212 C. Defendant in Instant Case.., 212

Statement of Reasons for Sentencing Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2) JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction............................................................48 II. Facts ..................................................................48 A. Offense Conduct................................................

WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge: Anselem Udechukwu ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York law against the City of New York (the "City") and New York City Police Department ("NYPD") Officers Delsano and Christopher Doll (together, the "City Defendants"), and Gam

JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Altin Nicaj seeks reconsideration of the Court's decision granting judgment as a matter of law as to certain of his claims in favor of defendants Mark Beharry, Christopher Lombardi, Milton Arocho, and the City of New York (together, "Defendants"), and a new trial pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the Court den

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 15-2321 OLGA ARECELI MOLINA-DIAZ, Petitioner, v. ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting United States Attorney General,* Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Befor

SUMMARY ORDER At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 15th day of December, two thousand and five. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. Nana Opoku Agyemang petitions for review

518 F.Supp.2d 1071 (2007) Sherry L. McEVERS, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 1:06-cv-36 RWP-TJS. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Western Division. October 31, 2007. *1072 Gary L. Hayward, United States Attorney, Des Moines, IA, for Defendant. Gregory W.

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Plaintiffs Shai’if Stinson, Mariam Farnum, Charlene Finley, Ryburn Walkes, Jamel Towe, Christian Dudley, Jocelyn Ferdinand, Gary Shaw, Michael Bennett, Chanel Meau-sa, David Thompson, Joseph Sarpong, Jeremy Thames, Sean Pettigrew, Leander Griffin, Brian Moms, Mica Anerum, Ricardo Jones, Victor Breland, and Michael Riddick (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have requeste

ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge. Introduction This is an appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment declaring the status and positions of various members of the Spirit and Truth Church. Mark Barnaby, who was pastor and president of the Church’s board of directors, purported to remove from membership in the Church the other two directors on the board, thereby disqualifying them from service on the

Opinion issued October 10, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00347-CV ——————————— IN THE INTEREST OF R.A.L., A CHILD On Appeal from the 310th District Court

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO SPIRIT & TRUTH CHURCH, et al., ) No. ED100421 ) Plaintiffs/Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs. )

842 F.Supp. 101 (1994) Gregory LUCAS, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY, et al., Defendants. No. 93 Civ. 3367. United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 21, 1994. *102 Gregory Lucas, pro se plaintiff. City of New York Law Dept., New York City, for defendant New York City (Awo Sarpong, of counsel). Armienti, Bro