Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. SHABAZZ”
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 17-43 (JDB) RAHMAN SHABAZZ, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Before the Court is a motion by defendant Rahman Shabazz seeking compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). This Court denied his motion in November 2020,
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
564 F.3d 280 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Bilial SHABAZZ, Appellant. No. 08-2145. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) March 24, 2009. Opinion filed: April 16, 2009. *282 Mark S. Greenberg, Esquire, Lacheen, Wittles & Greenberg, Philadelphia, PA, for A
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramadan Tajedeen Shabazz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Shabazz has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Shabazz’s claim of ineffective assistance of
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Abdullah Shabazz appeals the thirty-six month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea and conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. We review de novo the district court’s imposition of a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Hasan Shabazz appeals the demal of his motion to suppress evidence seized at Ms *564residence pursuant to a search warrant. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The issuance of a search warrant by a judge is reviewed for clear error. United, States v. Bowman, 215 F.3d 951, 963 n. 6 (9th Cir.2000).
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
ORDER Samiyra Shabazz appeals her conviction and sentence. The parties have waived oral argument and upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Shabazz was tried to a jury on charges of aiding and abetting the making of false statements to the United States Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 2. In charging
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Circuit Judge. On July 16, 2001, Troy Robinson pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Robinson was placed in a sentencing range of 46 to 57 months’ imprisonment under the Sentencing Guidelines.1 Robinson moved for a downward departure based on a family hardship pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5H1.6 (Fa
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21 )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$ ; 3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH 1R Y
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
TROIDL, Senior Judge: A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of wrongful distribution of marijuana and maiming, in violation of Articles 112a and 124, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a and 924 (1994).1 The adjudged sentence includes a dishonorable discharge, seven years confinement, total forfeitures, and reduction to
United States v. Shabazz, Abdullahpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 99-3948 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ABDULLAH SHABAZZ, also known as DANIEL CLINCY, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. No. 98 CR 127--J.P. Stadtmueller, Chief Judge. Argued September 29, 2000--Decided October 6, 2000/* Before EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE and EVANS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Abdullah Shabazz seeks review of the sen
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
OPINION FRYE, District Judge. The matters pending before the court are: The Motions of Defendant Toni Lacava Newborn Defendant Newborn’s motion for severance (# 113); *1111Defendant Newborn’s motion for early production of Jencks Act material (# 115); The Motion of Def
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
48 F.3d 1213 U.S.v.Shabazz NO. 94-1267 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Dec 15, 1994 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y.92-cr-575 1 VACATED AND REMANDED.
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
883 F.Supp. 422 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Qubilah Bahiyah SHABAZZ. No. 4-95-CR-3. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. April 27, 1995. *423 Scott F. Tilsen, Daniel Martin Scott, U.S. Public Defenders Office, Larry Burton Leventhal, Leventhal Law Office, Minneapolis, MN, William M. Kunstler, Kunstl
Shabazz v. United Statespublic domain
17-167-cr Shabazz v. United States of America 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2017 5 6 (Argued: February 26, 2018 Decided: April 26, 2019) 7 8 Docket No. 17‐167 9 10 11 _____________________________________ 12
Shabazz v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Shabazz v. United Statespublic domain
LEVAL, Circuit Judge: *83Petitioner Al-Malik Fruitkwan Shabazz petitions for rehearing of our decision of January 4, 2019, in which we ruled that his prior Connecticut convictions for robbery under Con. Gen. Stat. § 53a-133 qualify as predicate convictions under the Force Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 ("ACCA"),
Shabazz v. United Statespublic domain
LEVAL, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal by the United States from a grant of habeas corpus under *7428 U.S.C. § 2255 by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Stefan R. Underhill, J .) in favor
Shabazz v. United Statespublic domain
17-167-cr Shabazz v. United States of America 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2017 5 6 (Argued: February 26, 2018 Decided: January 4, 2019 ) 7 8 Docket No. 17‐167 9 10 11 _____________________________________ 12
United States v. Qadir Shabazzpublic domain
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: Qadir Shabazz orchestrated a multi-state tax-fraud scheme using Indigent Inmate, a prisoner "charity" he founded and financed. Prisoners interested in receiving financial support, religious materials, and other assistance items completed applications that required them to provide personal identifying information. Shabazz and his associates then used that
United States v. Shabazzpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REVERCOMB, District Judge. Defendants in this action have pled guilty to violations of the Uniformed Controlled Substances Act. Mr. Shabazz entered a guilty plea to one count of Unlawful Conspiracy to Distribute Dilaudid (hydromorphone hydrochloride) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and Mr. McNiel pled guilty to one count of Distribution of Dilaudid in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) an