Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Saenz-Dominguez”
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On
Flores-Escobedo v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 66 Fed. Appx. 523 (ninth judgment); 67 Fed. Appx. 243 (second judgment), 244 (first judgment), 245 (sixth and seventh judgments), and 246 (third, fourth, fifth, and eighth judgments).
United States v. Freemanpublic domain
19-2432 United States v. Freeman United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2020 Argued: September 11, 2020 Decided: November 4, 2021 No. 19-2432 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ap
United States v. Richardsonpublic domain
521 F.3d 149 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Kasha RICHARDSON, Defendant, Carol Dominguez, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 05-7005-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: June 22, 2007. Decided: February 15, 2008. Amended: March 20, 2008. *150
United States v. Dominguezpublic domain
05-7005-cr U nited States v. D om inguez 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term 2006 4 Docket No. 05-7005-cr 5 Argued: June 22, 2007 Decided: February 15, 2008 6 _____________________________________________________________________
United States v. Dominguezpublic domain
05-7005-cr United States v. Dominguez 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term 2006 4 Docket No. 05-7005-cr 5 Argued: June 22, 2007 Decided: February 15, 2008 6 Amended: March
United States v. Jose Escalante-Reyespublic domain
REVISED AUGUST 13, 2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-40632 July
United States v. Jose Escalante-Reyespublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting, joined by EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge, and EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge, and joined as to parts LA, I.B, and I.D by EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: I respectfully dissent. For the first time ever, this court reverses a below-guideline sentence for alleged unfairness. And for at least the 181st time, it reverses a case on plain error, despite the Supreme C
United States v. Brikapublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0188p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERIC
United States v. Cordova-Arevalopublic domain
O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge. On June 18, 2004, Jesus Cordova-Areva-lo (Cordova-Arevalo) pled guilty to illegally reentering the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1),(2). The presentence investigation report (PSR) recommended a sixteen-level-enhancement pursuant to USSG § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A), treating Cordova-Areva-lo’s prior Colorado conviction (third de
United States v. Gonzalez-Coronadopublic domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Lorenzo Gonzalez-Coronado (“Gonzalez”) appeals the prison sentence he received for entering the United States unlawfully after having previously been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Gonzalez first contends the district court, in sentencing him, erred by treating his prior felony conviction for attempted aggravated assault
United States v. Loutospublic domain
284 F.Supp.2d 942 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Peter A. LOUTOS, Sr., Defendant. No. 01 CR 852-3. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 3, 2003. *943 *944 *945 Edward G. Kohler, Patrick S. Layng, U.S. Attorney
United States v. Childresspublic domain
746 F.Supp. 1122 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, v. Willie C. CHILDRESS, et al. Crim. No. 89-0162. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 29, 1990. *1123 *1124 Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., District of Columbia and Asst. U.S. Attys., John P. Dominguez and David Schertler, f
WIENER, Circuit Judge: In this direct criminal appeal, Defendants-Appellants Herbert James and Jerry Washington complain that the district court committed several errors, some during their trial and others during their sentencing on numerous counts arising from their involvement in a drug distribution ring. Finding no error, we affirm their convictions and sentences in all respe
Short v. Westpublic domain
662 F.3d 320 (2011) Michael SHORT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sheriff Arvin WEST, Individually and in his capacity as Sheriff of Hudspeth County, Texas, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50992. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. November 2, 2011. *323 Lynn Anne Coyle (argued), Dominguez & Coyle, P.L.L.C., El Paso, TX, for P
David Martinez Jr. v. Statepublic domain
NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE CHIEF JUSTICE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR ROGELIO VALDEZ CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 361-888-0416 (TEL) JUSTICES
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Bryan Alexander Gomez-Rivera, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") upholding an immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We affirm. I. Background Gomez-Rivera entered the United States in June 2014, when he was 13 years old
State v. Saenzpublic domain
Memorandum Decision ROTH, Judge: 11 Jesse A. Saenz appeals his convictions for murder, a first degree felony; theft, a second degree felony; 'and possession of a firearm by a restricted person, a second degree felony. Because Saenz has not demonstrated that the trial court's alleged error prejudiced him, we affirm. 12 Saenz's convi
People v. Superior Court (Gooden)public domain
Filed 11/19/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D075787 Petitioner, v. (Super. Ct. No. CR61365) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; ALLEN GOODEN, Real Party in Interest.