Cases

St. Eve, Circuit Judge. Jesus Salgado pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin. At sentencing, over Salgado's objection, the district court applied an aggravating role enhancement and calculated the Guidelines range to be 210 to 262 months' imprisonment. The court sentenced Salgado below that range, to 192 months' imprisonment. It explained, however, that even if it were wrong on the enhancement's app

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ro-salino Salgado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salga-do has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Vladimir Salgado-Brito has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Salga-do-Brito has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ar-geo Salgado-Ortega has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Salgado-Ortega has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s moti

MEMORANDUM ** Everardo Salgado-Rojas appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month mandatory minimum sentence for manufacture of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(vii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Salga-do-Rojas’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdra

MEMORANDUM ** Everardo Salgado-Rojas appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month mandatory minimum sentence for manufacture of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(vii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Salga-do-Rojas’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdra

519 F.3d 411 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Laura SALGADO and Daniel Pacheco-Gonzales, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 07-2163, 07-2393. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 27, 2008. Decided March 17, 2008. March 17, 2008. *412 Renai Scherri Rodne

Order The principal issue presented by this appeal has been resolved recently by United States v. Martinez-Martinez, 442 F.3d 539 (7th Cir.2006), and United States v. Galicia-Cardenas, 443 F.3d 553 (7th Cir.2006). The defendant’s double-counting argument is incompatible with United States v. Jimenez, 897 F.2d 286 (7th Cir.1990). On the authority of those decisions, the judgment is affirmed.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 07-2163 & 07-2393 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LAURA SALGADO and DANIEL PACHECO-GONZALES, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States District

Order The principal issue presented by this appeal has been resolved recently by United States v. Martinez-Martinez, 442 F.3d 539 (7th Cir.2006), and United States v. Galicia-Cardenas, 443 F.3d 553 (7th Cir.2006). The defendant’s double-counting argument is incompatible with United States v. Jimenez, 897 F.2d 286 (7th Cir.1990). On the authority of those decisions, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Raul Salgado-Ramos raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, *366118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s mo

MEMORANDUM** Adolfo Salgado appeals his conditional guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(ii)(II). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Salgado argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. First, Salgado contends that the police officer’s que

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH  (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$ ; 3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH    1RV Y

PER CURIAM.* Juan Carlos Salgado-Rodríguez (“Salgado”) appeals the sentence he received fol*604lowing his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He challenges the 16-level enhancement he received because of his prior aggravated felony conviction for aiding and abetting the transportation of illegal ali

PER CURIAM:* Arturo Salgado-Castro appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Salgado-Castro contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one under th

PER CURIAM.* The Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Yolanda Salgado-Santana (Salgado), has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Salgado has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the

MEMORANDUM** Simon Salgado-Castillo appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for unlawful reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Salgado-Castillo has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to w

MEMORANDUM2 Artemio Salgado-Castillo appeals the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an alien found in the United States following deportation. Sal-gado-Castillo contends that in light of Ap-prendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 13

167 F.3d 539 U.S.v.Salgado* NO. 96-5006 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. December 31, 1998 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. , No.95-00091-CR-LCN 2</

MEMORANDUM2 Bruno Salgado-Pita appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an alien found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Salgado-Pita contends that the district court erred by sentencing him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) when it enhanced his sentence by 16 levels for his prior aggravated felony. Specifically, he argues tha