Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. Plaintiffs in this ease are 278 current and former employees of the United States Post *6 al Service (USPS), residing in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. They allege that the USPS

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. The plaintiffs in this case are a large number of current and former employees of the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), residing in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. They allege that the USPS failed to properly compensate them when overtime was worked, and they seek to certify a class for purposes of obtaining back pay and other damages. Pending before th

Fagone, U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge. Alexis Ramirez Rosado and Elsie E. Berrios Salgado (collectively, the “Debtors”) appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying their motion seeking the imposition of sanctions for contempt against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“Banco Popular”) under § 105, on account of an alleged violation of the discharge injunction.1 They also seek to appeal from

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1381 Doc: 40 Filed: 07/13/2023 Pg: 1 of 57 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1381 ODALIS MIREIDA CHICAS-MACHADO, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petitio

El Juez Asociado Señor Rebollo López emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Como resultado de los hechos acaecidos en el Cerro Ma-ravilla en julio de 1978, Jaime Quiles Hernández fue acu-sado y convicto por seis cargos de perjurio en el Tribunal de Distrito Federal para el Distrito de Puerto Rico. Como con-secuencia de lo anterior, fue sentenciado a dos años de pri-sión por cada cargo, los cuales debían cumplirse cons

OPINION OF THE COURT Ritter, J. The County Court ordered a Darden hearing (People v Darden, 34 NY2d 177) before deciding a motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant that was issued on the basis of information supplied "in large part” by a confidential informant. The court’s action was taken "to guard against fabrication of informants [and] to insure [the informant] exists

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Anthony Dilworth (“Dilworth”) and Patricia Dilworth (“Patricia”) (together, “the Dilworths” or “plaintiffs”) have brought this action arising out of Dilworth’s confinement in the Westchester County Jail (the “WCJ”). They allege various federal and state claims against New York Medical College (“NYMC”), Westchester County,

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the Statement of Uncontested Material Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 40), which was referred to Magistrate Judge Camille Velez Rivé for a report and recommendation (Docket Nos. 72 and 73). Upon review of Magistrate Judge’s Report an

El Juez Presidente Señor Andréu García emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Al expedir el recurso de certiorari presentado en el caso de epígrafe nos corresponde establecer si procede la supre-sión de la evidencia obtenida como resultado de un registro con orden judicial, llevado a cabo en una estructura de ocu-pación múltiple, en la que no se especificaron las subuni-dades que habrían de ser r

Opinión concurrente y disidente del Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García. Concurrimos con el dictamen en el Caso Núm. RE-86-326 de López Matos y Hernández Rivera v. E.L.A. En su comparecencia, el Procurador General acepta que el tribunal sentenciador cometió dos (2) errores y que el Estado no puede sostener la confiscación usando sólo evidencia pre-viamente supr

Mr. Justice Ramírez Bages delivered the opinion of the Court. Justo Berrios, appellant herein, alleges that appellees Luis and Juan Zayas Salgado and their mother Maria Luisa Salgado Diaz, who died during the prosecution of this litigation, are placed between the horns of a dilemma; that is, that in view of the particular circumstances of the present controversy, either the defense of res judicata lies or the

RESOLUCIÓN I El 20 de marzo de 1996 el Sr. Ángel Figueroa Vivas (en adelante el Peticionario) presentó ante este Tribunal una petición, solicitando la reapertura de los procedimientos de su separación permanente de la profesión de abogado de-cretada en In re Colton Fontán, 128 D.P.R. 1 (1991). Alegó que en los procedimientos de su desaforo hubo fraude al Tribunal debido a la ocultación de prueba exculpatoria y f