Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Sanchez Lopez”
United States v. Lopez-Sanchezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Catarino Lopez-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portion
United States v. Lopez-Sanchezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Isidro , Lopez-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
United States v. Sanchez-Lopezpublic domain
ALARCON, Circuit Judge: Epifanio Sanchez-Lopez, Brijido Astor-ga-Ayon, Antonio Martinez-Ortega, and Guillermo Sanchez-Lopez (appellants) appeal from the district court’s judgment of conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), 846; conspiracy to distribute heroin under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), 846; possession of cocaine with intent to distribute under 21 U.S.C. § 84
United States v. Jesus Sanchez-Lopezpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Jesus Sanchez-Lopez pleaded guilty to unauthorized presence in the United States after removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and was sentenced to twenty-four months’ imprisonment—a term ninety days above the properly calculated guidelines range. Mr. Sanchez-Lopez contends that the district court erred when, in an effort to deter future illegal reentr
United States v. Lopez-Sanchezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jeremias Lopez-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Lopez-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan
United States v. Lopez-Sanchezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Martin Lopez-Sanchez (Lopez) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. Lopez argues *911that the district court committed reversible error under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), by sentencing him pursuant to a mandatory application of t
Angelica Sanchez v. Miriam Lopez Sanchezpublic domain
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Three children who are natives of Mexico, through a next friend, appeal the district court’s finding under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction that they were being wrongfully retained in the United States and should be returned to Angelica Sanchez, their mother. While this appeal was pending, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services grant
Lopez v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Sanchez-Lopez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Lopez-Sanchezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM** Jose Octavio Lopez-Sanchez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 121-month sentence for conspiracy to manufacture, distribute and possess with intent to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Lopez-Sanchez has filed a brief stating that he finds no
Sanchez-Lopez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Lopez-Sanchez v. Tamezpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Sanchezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Jose Sanchez appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to reduce his sentence, under § 3582(c)(2). Sanchez (a former TSA agent) was eligible for a potential reduction. But the district court retained the discretion to refuse to reduce the sentence. The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant Sanchez relief: a decision based on the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors — the court conducted
Sanchez-Lopez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Sanchez-Leonpublic domain
MATHESON, Circuit Judge. Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) officers searched Mr. Sanchez-Leon’s home, where they discovered methamphetamine, firearms, and cash. A federal grand jury charged Mr. Sanchez-Leon with violating various federal drug laws. On the first day of trial, he changed his plea to guilty. He later moved to withdraw his guilty plea, which the district court denied.
Lopez v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
United States v. Sanchez-Sandovalpublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** *694In these consolidated appeals, Lucas Gerardo Sanchez-Sandoval appeals from the revocation of his supervised release and the consecutive 21-month sentences imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Sanchez-Sandoval’s counsel has filed a brief stating there
Lopez-Sanchez v. Marylandpublic domain
Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Sanchezpublic domain
508 F.3d 456 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Cesar SANCHEZ, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Gustav Lopez Naranjo, Appellant. Nos. 06-4193, 07-1046. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 24, 2007. Filed: November 29, 2007. *457 John J. Bish
United States v. Jose Lopezpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. In these consolidated appeals, Jose Lopez, Pedro Esparza-Diaz, Pedro Arrelucea-Zamudio, and Silvestre Brito-Hernandez (“Appellants”) challenge the constitutionality and reasonableness of the sentences they received after pleading guilty to illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2).