⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Sanchez-Arvizu”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 16-41378 Document: 00514525230 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2018 REVISED June 22, 2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-41378
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-06-20 · Published · cited 17× · 893 F.3d 312
PER CURIAM: Mario Sanchez-Arvizu pleaded guilty to illegal reentry and was sentenced to 42 months in prison. He appeals, arguing for the first time that the district court erred by applying a 16-level enhancement for his prior conviction for indecency with a child. Concluding that the district court committed reversible plain error, we VACATE his sentence and REMAND for resentencing.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 1013
*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 1013
*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-08-15 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 24-2080 Document: 60-1 Date Filed: 08/15/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 15, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-08-05 · Published · cited 5× · 111 F.4th 651
Case: 23-50487 Document: 102-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/05/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50487 ____________
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-08-17 · Published · cited 10× · 78 F.4th 707
Case: 21-10966 Document: 00516861985 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-03-28 · Published · cited 11× · 63 F.4th 473
Case: 21-51208 Document: 00516692784 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 28, 202
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-01-05 · Published · cited 3× · 57 F.4th 237
Case: 21-11135 Document: 00516598577 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/05/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 5, 2023
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-03-17 · Published · cited 0× · 130 F.4th 1125
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-393 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:15-cr-01390- v. JGZ-EJM-3 ABELARDO RODRIGUEZ- OPINION ARVIZU, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-07-13 · Published · cited 33× · 40 F.4th 339
Case: 21-40091 Document: 00516393399 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 13, 2022
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-03-08 · Published · cited 23× · 27 F.4th 375
Case: 21-40307 Document: 00516229184 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 8, 2022
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021-07-30 · Published · cited 15× · 6 F.4th 651
Case: 20-60056 Document: 00515958733 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/30/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 30, 2021
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020-12-29 · Published · cited 2× · 983 F.3d 1151
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH December 29, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-09-02 · Published · cited 2× · 47 F.4th 984
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF No. 21-10248 AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:19-cr-01468-CKJ-MSA-1 v. 4:19-cr-01468-CKJ-MSA SERGIO GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-09-01 · Published · cited 6× · 11 F.4th 898
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3451 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Aldo Daniel Gastelum
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018-10-16 · Published · cited 0× · 349 F. Supp. 3d 1007
Helen Gillmor, United States District Judge Defendant Chase Williams moves to suppress evidence seized from a United States Postal Service Priority Mail Express Parcel. Defendant Williams also seeks to suppress evidence found pursuant to a search warrant of his residence following his detention. Defendant Williams makes three arguments. First, Defendant contends that Postal Inspectors lacke
District Court, D. Kansas · 2018-09-17 · Published · cited 0× · 337 F. Supp. 3d 1107
JOHN W. BROOMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case comes before the court on Defendant's motion to suppress and motion to dismiss count 4. (Docs. 28, 30.) The motions have been fully briefed and the court held an evidentiary hearing on August 21, 2018. (Docs. 29, 31, 32, 33.) Defendant's motion to suppress is DENIED and Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED for the reasons herein. I. Facts
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-02-24 · Published · cited 2× · 988 F.3d 1034
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 19-3214 United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Raul Flores Marin Defendant - Appellant Appeal from United States District Court
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-03-09 · Published · cited 0× · 294 F. Supp. 3d 1227
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on defendant Quincy D'Own Nash's Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence and Statements and Corrected Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence and Statements. [Docs. 15, 32].1 The government opposes the motions. Based upon the pleadings of the parties, the facts of this case and applicable law, Mr. Nash's motions are hereby granted.