Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Sanchez-Flores”
United States v. Sanchez-Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Edgar Ricardo Sanchez-Flores appeals his conviction for illegal reentry by an *781alien after deportation. Sanchez’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Sanchez contends that Almenda
Sanchez-Flores v. United Statespublic domain
544 U.S. 902 SANCHEZ-FLORESv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-8307. Supreme Court of United States. March 7, 2005. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 110 Fed. Appx. 463. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, a
United States v. Flores-Sanchezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 06-10026 v. D.C. No. CR-04-00802-DGC JOSE FLORES-SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Jose Mendoza-Sanchez, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from
United States v. Luis Sanchez-Florespublic domain
162 F.3d 1175 98 CJ C.A.R. 5192 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: Jose Flores-Sanchez (“Sanchez”) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 1 He assigns error to: (1) denial of his motion to dismiss the indictments; (2) commencement of trial one day after his first appearance on the superseding in
FAUSTO VS. SANCHEZ-FLORESpublic domain
137 Nev., Advance Opinion I I IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JAQUELINE FAUSTO, AN No. 80074 INDIVIDUAL, Appellant, vs. RICARDO SANCHEZ-FLORES, AN FILE ?. 1) INDIVIDUAL; AND VERENICE RUTH
Flores Sanchez v. Stewartpublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Oscar Flores-Sandoval, Also Known as Armando Polanco-Diaz, Also Known As, Daniel Sanchez-Rodriguezpublic domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Oscar Joel Flores-Sandoval was indicted for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). That indictment was dismissed, after this court’s opinion in United States v. Flores-Sandoval, 422 F.3d 711 (8th Cir.2005). Flores-Sandoval was re-indicted one week later. The district court
United States v. Oscar Flores-Sandoval, Also Known as Armando Polanco-Diaz, Also Known as Daniel Sanchez-Rodriguezpublic domain
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. We must decide whether the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) 1 may take custody of a person and fingerprint him without any admissible reason to believe the person is an illegal alien. We conclude that such a custodial detention without justification offends the Fourth Amendm
People v. Super. Court (Sanchez-Flores)public domain
Filed 12/16/15 Unmodified opinion attached IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, B266289 Plaintiff and Petitioner, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS153534) v.
Bello v. United Statespublic domain
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari as to Daniel G. Bello, Fidel Flores, Jose S. Olivarez, Rudy Martinez-Castillo, Lugardo Vazquez-Hernandez, Angel D. Sanabia-Sanchez, Lino I. Carrillo-Hernandez, and Hector A. Cabrera are granted. The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the United States Co
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ERIC FLORES, Appellant, v. UNITED FREEDOM ASSOCIATES, INC. AND AL SANCHEZ, Appellees. §
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ERIC FLORES, § No. 08-09-00158-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §
United States v. Degante-Galenopublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Alejandro Degante-Galeno, Alberto Jesus Martinez-Miranda, Manuel Gomez-Batana, and Isidro Degante-Gale-no stand convicted after guilty pleas of one count of conspiracy to violate the Travel Act in furtherance of a prostitution enterprise. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1952. Each defendant was sentenced principally to an above-Guidelines, statutory-maximum term of 60 months’ imprisonment, and each argues on appeal
Lugo-Gutierrez v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
United States v. Garcia-De La Rosapublic domain
PER CURIAM: This criminal case involves the prosecution of a large-scale sex-trafficking enterprise in the New York City area. 1 For several years, Defendants-Appellants Valentin Jiamez-Dolores and Pedro De-gante-Galeno participated in the prostitution ring, which involved
United States v. Martinezpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-Appellants Angel Cordero, Ian Burgess, Edgar Marino Sanchez, and Ricardo Delvi appeal from judgments of conviction entered against them by the District Court after a jury found them guilty of various offenses.1 On appeal, defendants-appellants challenge (1) the District Court’s admission of the redacted plea allocutions of three of their co-defendants; (2) the District Court’s fail
United States v. Martinezpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-Appellants Angel Cordero, Ian Burgess, Edgar Marino Sanchez, and Ricardo Delvi appeal from judgments of conviction entered against them by the District Court after a jury found them guilty of various offenses.1 On appeal, defendants-appellants challenge (1) the District Court’s admission of the redacted plea allocutions of three of their co-defendants; (2) the District Court’s fail
Salas v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Roberto Osuna-Sanchez, Manuel Aguirre-Barrera and Francisco Villa-Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: The United States appeals from an order suppressing evidence obtained from a warrantless search of an automobile following lawful arrest. The order was entered by the District Court on the authority of this court’s holding in Heffley v. Hocker, 420 F.2d 881 (9th Cir. 1969). In that case certiorari to the Supreme Court w