Cases

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before D.C. KING, B.T. PALMER, T.P. BELSKY Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DYSHARA J. ROMERO-SANCHEZ AVIATION MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATIONMAN FIRST CLASS (E-6) U.S. NAVY

MCCONNELL, District Judge. The petitioner, Juan Manuel Sánchez-Romero (Sánchez), seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his untimely motion to reopen removal proceedings based on changed conditions. Because we do not spot an abuse of discretion, Sánchez’s petition is denied. I. Sánchez, a Mexican national,

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Alfredo Romero-Sanchez appeals from his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse. Romero-Sanchez contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to *655dismiss the indictment, bec

15 F.3d 1094NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Luis SANCHEZ-SIERRA, aka, Jose Romero-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30123.

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: Appellant was convicted of facilitating the transportation and concealment of 1,140 grams of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174. On appeal she complains of the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on entrapment. We affirm. Appellant and her daughter were charged with t

III. DISCUSSION Mr. Slatten seeks to exclude all evidence "relating to alleged shooting and victims in Nisur Square after the shooting of the white Kia." 14-cr-107, ECF No. 716 at 1. He does not articulate particular pieces of evidence within that category of evidence, but rather argues that none of it is relevant to the single charge against him. He further contends that even if the evidence has some probative value, that

895 P.2d 212 (1995) 119 N.M. 690 Leroy ROMERO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellee. No. 21752. Supreme Court of New Mexico. April 24, 1995. *213 Grisham & Lawless, P.A., Thomas L. Grisham, Albuquerque, for appellant. Carpenter, Comeau, Maldegen, Brennan, Nixon & Templema

523 F.3d 1125 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felipe Daniel TAPIA-ROMERO, a/k/a David Perales Meraz, Daniel Pato, Felipe Daniel Pato, Felipe Romero Pato, Felipe Romero, Felipe Daniel Romero, Daniel Sanchez, Danny Tapia, Felipe Tapia, Felipe Daniel Tapia, Felipe Romero Tapia, Felipe Daniel Topia, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-50121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

MEMORANDUM * Felipe Daniel Tapia-Romero appeals his sentence and several terms of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm on all but one issue in this memorandum disposition. We address the remaining issue — whether the district court erred by declining to consider, under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the cost to society of a defendant’s term of imprisonment — in an accomp

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Terri Jordan and others seek a writ of mandamus ordering the district court to direct the government to return motorcycles seized in connection with a criminal investigation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 and deny the petition. “A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary or drastic remedy, used only to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jur

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

C. A: 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly respond to our order directing them to file a status report concerning how these appeals should proceed in view of this court’s decisions in O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed. Cir.2002) and Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002). The court previously granted the motion of Fernando Blanco et

*974(Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 564); (101 Fed. Appx. 458); (101 Fed. Appx. 563); (101 Fed. Appx. 492); (101 Fed. Appx. 560); (101 Fed. Appx. 464); (101 Fed. Appx. 559); (101 Fed. Appx. 483); (101 Fed. Appx. 509); (101 Fed. Appx. 481);

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

175 F.Supp.2d 129 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. [05] Martires Paulino CASTRO, [08] Esteban Martinez García, [23] Carlos Valdes, Defendants Criminal No. 00-0693(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 14, 2001. *130 Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, San Juan, for Rafael Reynoso-De-La-Cruz. Marl

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

*982(Reported below: 87 Fed. Appx. 930); (85 Fed. Appx. 363); (83 Fed. Appx. 620); (85 Fed. Appx. 367); (82 Fed. Appx. 901); (83 Fed. Appx. 622); (82 Fed. Appx. 902); (83 Fed. Appx. 623); (82 Fed. Appx. 908); (82 Fed. Appx. 904); (83 F