Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JACK ZOUHARY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Background Plaintiffs Ohio Immigrant Worker Project (“IWP”) and Farm Labor Organizing Committee (“FLOC”) allege Defendant United States Border Patrol, Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) maintains a policy, pattern and practice of targeting Hispanic individuals in conducting stops, detentions, interrogations and sear

Rulon, C.J.: Movant Timothy Collins appeals the district court’s summary denial of his K.S.A. 2003 Supp. 60-1507 motion. He contends tire district court erred in refusing to grant his request to be resentenced under State v. McAdam, 277 Kan. 136, 83 P.3d 161 (2004). We disagree and affirm. In January 2002, the movant was charged with the manufacture of methamphetamine, in violation of K.S.A. 65-4159(

OPINION PELANDER, J. ¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Colten Eugene Griffin was convicted of possessing a deadly weapon as a prohibited possessor in violation of A.R.S. § 13—3102(A)(4). He was acquitted of cruel mistreatment of an animal. The trial court sentenced Griffin to a presumptive four-and-one-half-year prison term and ordered him to pay restitution. Griffin contends his conviction imp

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

237 F.Supp.2d 721 (2002) SAVE OUR AQUIFER, an Unincorporated Association, et al., Plaintiffs, and League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) District 15, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.SA-02-CA-618-F. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. December 16, 2002.

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

507 U.S. 292 (1993) RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. v. FLORES et al. No. 91-905. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 13, 1992. Decided March 23, 1993. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *293 Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and W

Appellant was convicted of a sale of intoxicating liquor to two agents of the sheriff. The only point on which the appeal is predicated is the failure to give a requested instruction on entrapment. There was no error. The evidence showed no more than that appellant was given an opportunity to either violate the law or to refuse to do so, which does not constitute entrapment. (State v. Johnson, 42 Idaho 381, 246 P. 531

Opinion PANELLI, J. Defendant Adam Miranda was convicted of (count I) first degree murder of Gary Black (Pen. Code, § 187)1 with findings that he was armed with a firearm (§ 12022, subd. (a)) and used a firearm (§§ 12022.5, 1203.06, subd. (a)(1)); (count II) assault with intent to commit murder of Kelly Chandler (former § 217) with findings that he was armed with a firearm (§ 12022,

This action is based upon an information filed in a police court of the city of St. Louis by the chief of police, charging the defendant with having violated an ordinance of that city (Sec. 625, Revised Code St. Louis 1914, p. 975). The gist of this ordinance is to penalize fortune-telling, or, in the somewhat verbose language of the information, "the pursuit or practice of the pretended art of telling and revealing information of a secret or hidden nature pertaining to the past or future of

ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE