⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Schotz”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 247; 190 L. Ed. 2d 235; 83 U.S.L.W. 3195; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 6305
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Justice KAGANtook no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 566 U.S. 1043; 132 S. Ct. 2732
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 216 F. Supp. 3d 30; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152504; 2016 WL 6537921
MEMORANDUM OPINION Beryl A. Howell, CHIEF JUDGE This action brought under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) concluded on April 20, 2016, with the Court’s entry of judgment for the Defendant. The plaintiff, Barry R. Schotz, has moved separately for reconsideration of the judgment, ECF No. 41, and for fees and costs, ECF No. 43. The defendant has opposed e
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BARRY R. SCHOTZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-1212 (BAH) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF JUSTICE,
Schotz v. Apkerpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-06-24 · Published · cited 0× · 570 U.S. 927; 133 S. Ct. 2874; 186 L. Ed. 2d 927; 81 U.S.L.W. 3703; 2013 WL 2289973; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4874
Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
In re Schotzpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2016-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 992; 194 L. Ed. 2d 13; 84 U.S.L.W. 3415; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 951
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Schotz v. Samuelspublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-10-30 · Published · cited 1× · 72 F. Supp. 3d 81; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153815; 2014 WL 5472185
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This lawsuit, brought pro se by a federal prisoner, arises from the Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP) response to the plaintiffs request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for “documents within and outside his Inmate Central File.” Compl., Ex. A (FOIA Request
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-11-26 · Published · cited 0× · 72 F. Supp. 3d 401; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169162; 2014 WL 7398886
DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. On October 27, 2010, Defendant Joseph Olivieri (“Olivieri”) was.convicted of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. On June 3, 2011, the Court sentenced Olivieri to eighteen months imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release. Oli-vieri was released from prison on December 27, 2012, and has now completed almost twenty-three m
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014-08-13 · Published · cited 152× · 762 F.3d 255; 114 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5703; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15557; 59 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 246; 2014 WL 3929096
DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization in this case, all tax refund claims of a bankruptcy estate were assigned to a liquidating trust. Edward P. Bond, the trustee of the liquidating trust (“Liquidating Trustee”), filed a federal income tax refund claim in bankruptcy court. The government asserted (1) that its waiver of sovereign immunity for bankruptcy court adjudication of tax refun
District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-09-17 · Published · cited 3× · 486 B.R. 9; 110 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5969; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132598; 2012 WL 4089648
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER COGAN, District Judge. Before me is an appeal from a final order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York, which incorporated four interlocutory orders. The United States (hereinafter the “IRS”) challenges these interlocutory orders and the final order on eight separate grounds, most of which have sub-arguments. The Liquidating Trustee (“
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-08-15 · Published · cited 0× · 564 U.S. 1061
ante, p. 1032; 563 U. S. 1002; and ante, p. 1003. Petitions for rehearing denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-08-02 · Published · cited 4× · 811 F. Supp. 2d 829; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84892; 2011 WL 3370392
811 F.Supp.2d 829 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Robert EGAN and Bernard McGarry, Defendants. Bank of America, N.A., Clothing Emporium, Inc., Dep't of Veterans Affairs Federal Credit Union, Inserra Supermarkets, Inc., Mahopac Nat'l Bank, MoneyGram Int'l, Inc., Money Spot, Inc., Those Interested Underwriters *830 Who Subscribed to the Policies/Certificates of Insurance Numbered B0702BB008120Y and UM000
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010-02-02 · Published · cited 2× · 364 F. App'x 738
OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. Jeffrey D. Feldstein, M.D., brought this qui tam action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq., against appellees Organon and Schering Plough, claiming that Organon’s failure to disclose the harmful side effects of the pharmaceutical drug Raplon resulted in the submission of false claims to Medicare and Medicaid.1 T
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010-02-02 · Published · cited 0× · 364 F. App'x 738
OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. Jeffrey D. Feldstein, M.D., brought this qui tam action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq., against appellees Organon and Schering Plough, claiming that Organon’s failure to disclose the harmful side effects of the pharmaceutical drug Raplon resulted in the submission of false claims to Medicare and Medicaid.1 T
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-11-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) DENNIS ROGER BOLZE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-2858 (FYP) ) EXECUTIVE OFFICE F
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989-10-11 · Published · cited 274× · 887 F.2d 1141
PIERCE, Circuit Judge: These appeals stem from the convictions of various persons alleged to have been members of an international narcotics ring. This prosecution came to be known popularly as “The Pizza Connection Case.” Appellants present numerous issues for review. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the judgments of conviction and sentence of appellant Frank Castronovo on count ten and appell
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
12‐4803 United States v. Bond 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 August Term, 2013 6 7 8 (Argued: March 17, 2014 Decided: August 13, 2014) 9 10 Docket No. 12‐4803‐bk 11 12 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐x 13 14 United States of Am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018-10-01 · Published · cited 19× · 905 F.3d 151
FUENTES, Circuit Judge. James S. Biear, a federal prisoner, seeks information from various federal agencies under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"). 1 The Criminal Division of Appellee Department of Justice (the "Criminal Division") and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are among these agencies. Biear
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1983-07-28 · Published · cited 61× · 577 F. Supp. 1103; 19 ERC 1638; 13 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20843; 19 ERC (BNA) 1638; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15093
577 F.Supp. 1103 (1983) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Charles PRICE, Individually and D/B/A Price's Trucking Company; Virginia Price; Carl F. Price; Bernard Abramoff, Lee Garrell, Frank Abramoff, Individually and D/B/A A.G.A. Partnership; Astro-Pak Corp.; Chemical Control Corp.; William Carracino; Michael Colleton; Robert Day; Scientific Chemical Processing, Inc.; Leif R. Sigmond; Dominick Presto; Petroleum Tank Cleaning and Disposal, I
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995-12-08 · Published · cited 0× · 74 F.3d 1229; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38503; 1995 WL 769898
74 F.3d 1229 In re Westbourne Development Company; Westbourne Development Companyv.Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard NO. 95-5310 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Dec 08, 1995 Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 95-cv-00214 1 AFFIRMED.