Cases

XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge: On the basis of sealed probable cause affidavits, the Government obtained and executed three pre-indictment search warrants of Appellant Justin Smith’s home, business, and storage unit in March and April of 2016. Smith filed motions in the district court seeking to unseal the affidavits supporting these warrants. The Magistrate Judge initially gra

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO No. 19-mc-44 (BAH) CERTAIN SEALED WARRANT MATERIALS Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Associated Press, Cable News Network, Inc., The New York Times Company, POLITICO LLC, and WP Co., LLC, d/b/a the Washington Post (collectively

21-118 United States v. Sealed Defendant One United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2021 Submitted: May 11, 2022 Decided: September 21, 2022 No. 21-118 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

PER CURIAM: The government appeals Appellee's sentence of 80 months of imprisonment based on a 120-month statutory minimum that applies to Appellee's conviction and the absence of a motion by the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (e) to depart from tha

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Angus McGinty, a former Texas state court judge, pleaded guilty to Honest Services Wire Fraud after accepting bribes for favorable rulings. McGinty now alleges *666 that his attorneys were suspects in the same corruption investigation that led to his

FORTUNATO P. BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns a 15-year-old juvenile who has been sentenced to detention and a subsequent period of juvenile delinquent supervision in connection with a conviction for abusive sexual contact with a minor who had not attained the age of 12 years. In this appeal, we review several special conditions imposed for juvenile delinquent supe

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 12, 2024 Decided July 18, 2025 No. 24-5089 IN RE: SEALED CASE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:24-mc-00007) Ari Holtzblatt argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Jeremy W. Brinster. Daniel J. Lenerz, Assistant

591 F.3d 812 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEALED APPELLANT 1; Sealed Appellant 2, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 08-30284, 08-30551. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 28, 2009. *815 Michael Edward McMahon, Stephen Andrew Higginson, Asst. U.S. Attys., New Orleans, LA, for U.S. S

PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: Appellant, a federal prisoner, challenges her commitment to a mental-health treatment facility within the federal prison system pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4245. We affirm. I The Government sought and obtained an order committing Appellant to a mental-health unit in Federal Medical Center Carswell (Carswell). Carswell is a multi-unit medical and mental-health

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1730 In re: SEARCH WARRANT ISSUED JUNE 13, 2019 ____________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at B

REVISED February 15, 2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 10-11163 FILED December 19, 2011 SEALED APPE

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1730 In re: SEARCH WARRANT ISSUED JUNE 13, 2019 ____________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at B

HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: The issue before this court is whether sufficient, accurate facts warranted revocation of the conditional discharge for medical treatment of a person (“C.K.”). We hold that the revocation was proper, because the provisions of Title 18, United States Code § 4246(f) were adhered to. Specifically, the district court held a hearing, at which time two expert

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 6, 2013 No. 12-10153 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk SEAL

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Decided August 7, 2020 Reissued August 20, 2020 No. 19-1216 IN RE: SEALED CASE On Joint Motion to Enter Proposed Protective Order with Separate Statements and Motion to Proceed Under a Pseudonym Before: TATEL, MILLETT, and PILLARD, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit J

*144MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN M. FACCIOLA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. Background On November 26, 2013, this Court granted Robert Berman’s Motion to Unseal Search Warrant Ajfidavit(s) [# 21] and ordered that the docket in this then-thirteen year-old search warrant case be unsealed in full. See In re: Searc

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 23, 2023 Decided September 5, 2023 Reissued September 13, 2023 No. 23-3001 IN RE: SEALED CASE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:22-sc-02144) John P. Rowley, III argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs

PUBLIC COPY - SEALED INFORMATION DELETED ~nih~o ~httcs C!Iourt of J\ppcals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 19, 2023 Decided July 18, 2023 Reissued August 9, 2023 No. 23-5044 lNRE: SEALED CASE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:23-sc-00031) Ari Holtzbl

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN M. FACCIOLA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is petitioner Robert A. Berman’s Motion to Unseal Search Warrant Affidavit(s) [#21], which relates to a search and seizure warrant issued by this Court on March 25, 2000. The government opposes this Motion only insofar as it would reveal grand jury material. See Response to Motion to Unseal Sea

06-1590-cv Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant #1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2007 (Submitted: June 27, 2008 Decided: August 12, 2008) Docket No. 06-1590-cv SEALED PLAINTIFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SE