Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Sellers”
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Frederick Lynn Sellers seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his self-styled “Motion for Modification of Imposed Term of Imprisonment Pursuant to § 3582(C)(i)” as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a cir
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Frederick Lynn Sellers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Unit
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
DRONEY, Circuit Judge: Jamell Sellers was sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) of the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”).1 Judgment was entered on November 20, 2013, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Johnson, J.). Sell
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
13‐4431‐cr United States v. Sellers 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 5 August Term, 2014 6
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 14, 2008, defendant Sidney Sellers was indicted on one count of possessing with the intent to distribute fifty or more grams of crack in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), one count of possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and one count of poss
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
595 F.3d 791 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald SELLERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-2037. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 15, 2009. Decided February 25, 2010. Elizabeth Altman (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Reed Cornia (argued),
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
*622 ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on Defendant Ronald “Joey” Sellers Ex Parte Application in Support of an Order for the Issuance of Subpoena Pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 17(a), 17(b) & 17(c) (Dkt. # 1347), filed under seal. BACKG
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Frederick Lynn Sellers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Frederick Lynn Sellers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
PER CURIAM: Frederick Lynn Sellers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A pri
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
SILER, Circuit Judge. Ronald Hunter and Edwin Culp appeal their convictions for murder in furtherance of a continuing criminal enterprise (“CCE”) under 21 U.S.C. § 848(e)(1)(A). Damond Sellers and David Powell appeal their convictions and sentences that followed their Rule 11 Plea Agreements. BACKGROUND These appeals arise from a large drug conspiracy in Detroit in the 1980s and ’90s. Tim
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
PER CURIAM. The defendant-appellant, Dwayne Sellers (“Sellers”), has assailed his ninety-nine month imprisonment sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and to distribute, cocaine base (“crack”). He has contended that the district court prejudicially erred by failing to directly inquire at his sentencing hearing whether he had read his Pre-Sentence Report (“PSR”) and had discussed it with his attorney;
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
848 F.Supp. 73 (1994) UNITED STATES of America v. W. Harold SELLERS, Robert Dupre & Michael J. Barrack. Crim. No. 93-327. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. February 23, 1994. Order Granting Reconsideration of Decision in Part March 9, 1994. *74 ORDER AND REASONS McNAMARA,
Sellers v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
Opinion of the Court EVERETT, Senior Judge: Airman First Class Stephan Sellers was tried at Plattsburgh Air Force Base, New York, by a general court-martial with officer members on charges that in October 1988 he had wrongfully used marihuana and on April 22, 1989, he had raped and forcibly sodomized Monica Jean Lewis, see Arts. 112a, 120 and 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U
United States v. Daryle Sellerspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-50061 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:12-cr-00722-TJH-3 DARYLE LAMONT SELLERS, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Centra
Sellers v. United Statespublic domain
Reversed and remanded Broderick
Sellers v. United Statespublic domain
Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
United States v. Sellerspublic domain
796 F.2d 475 U.S.v.Sellers 86-6517 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. 6/26/86 1 D.S.C. AFFIRMED
United States v. James Sellerspublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge SHEDD wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge KEENAN joined. SHEDD, Circuit Judge: A federal jury convicted James Morris Sellers of unlawfully possessing a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing, the district court determined that Sellers qualified as an armed career criminal under the