Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Sgouros”
Bekele v. Lyft, Inc.public domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This case is about the enforceability of an arbitration clause alleged to be unconscionable under Massachusetts law. Yilkal Bekele, the plaintiff, drove for Lyft, Inc., the defendant, starting in mid-2014. Bekele tapped "I accept" on his iPhone 4 when presented with Lyft's Terms of Service Agreement ("TOS Agreement"), which contains a provis
Nicole Lampo v. Amedisys Holding, LLCpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Nicole Lampo, Respondent, v. Amedisys Holding, LLC, and Leisa Victoria Neasbitt, Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2019-000451 Appeal From Georgetown County Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5934 Heard February 9, 2022 – Filed
Camilo v. Lyft, Inc.public domain
ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge: *437On October 17, 2017, Gustavo Camilo (hereinafter, "Plaintiff" or "Mr. Camilo") filed this putative class action in New York state court under the Class Action Fairness Act against Lyft, Inc., Endor Car & Driver, LLC, Tri-City, LLC, Tri-State Car and Driver, LLC, Black Car Assistance Corporation, an
Loretta Marshall v. Georgetown Memorial Hospitalpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2010 Doc: 28 Filed: 08/13/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-2010 LORETTA SABRINA MARSHALL, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GE
Zachman v. Hudson Valley Federal Credit Unionpublic domain
21-999-cv Zachman v. Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 ____________________ 5 6 August Term, 2021 7 8 (Argued: March 16, 2022 Decided: September 14, 2022) 9 10 Docket No. 21-999-cv 11 12 ____________________ 13 14
Jim Rose v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1042 JIM ROSE and ANITA GIAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court f
Emmanuel v. Handy Technologies, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1378 MAISHA EMMANUEL, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. HANDY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge]
Barry Rowland v. Sandy Morris Financialpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1187 BARRY ROWLAND; DONNA ROWLAND, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. SANDY MORRIS FINANCIAL & ESTATE PLANNING SERVICES, LLC; SANDEVA O’BRYAN MORRIS, Defendants – Appellants, and GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC; GF INVESTMENT SERVICES, LLC; MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2301 Doc: 61 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2301 DARRELL J. AUSTIN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., De
BLAKEY, District Judge. This dispute arises from the 2013 fire at the Milwaukee County Courthouse (the “Courthouse”). Milwaukee County (the “County”) maintained its primary insurance policy covering the Courthouse with the State of Wisconsin Local Government Property Insurance Fund (the “Fund”). The Fund in turn engaged defendant Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”) as either its reinsurer or excess insurer (the parties
Rajesh Gupta v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, Lpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-3584 RAJESH GUPTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court f
Wu v. Uber Tech., Inc.public domain
Wu v Uber Tech., Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 05869) Wu v Uber Tech., Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 05869 Decided on November 25, 2024 Court of Appeals Cannataro, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua
Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.public domain
CHIN, Circuit Judge: In 2014, plaintiff-counter-defehdant-ap-pellee Spencer Meyer downloaded onto his smartphone a software application offered by defendant-counter-claimant-appellant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”), a technology company that operates, among other things, a ride-hailing service, Meyer then registered for an Uber account with his smartphone. After using the application approximately ten times, Meyer brought this
Herzog v. Super. Ct.public domain
Filed 5/16/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LARA HERZOG et al., D082847 Petitioners, v. (San Diego County Super. Ct. Nos. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN 37-2022-00049800-CU-PL-CTL, DIEGO COUNTY,
Keena v. Groupon, Inc.public domain
ORDER Graham C. Mullen, United States District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Groupon Inc.’s Motion to Compel Arbitration or in the Alternative Dis*633miss Pursuant .to Rule 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 21). Plaintiff filed a Response in Opposition on May 9, 2016 (Doc. No. 30), and Defendant filed its Reply on May 31 (Doc. No. 31). Acco
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 15‐1973 STATE OF WISCONSIN LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROPERTY INSURANCE FUND, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant‐Appellant, v.
Pilar Domer v. Menard, Inc.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2672 PILAR DOMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MENARD, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the West
Pilar Domer v. Menard, Inc.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2672 PILAR DOMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MENARD, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the West
Woerner v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.public domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Joseph Woerner was an insurance agent for Bankers Life and Casualty Company. He alleges that his hiring by Bankers Life was part of a pyramid scheme in which Bankers Life hires more agents than it needs in order to exact the fees it charges new agents, and to claw back sales commissions under false pretenses when surplus
Meyer v. Kalanickpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, United States District Judge. Since the late eighteenth century, the Constitution of the. United States and the constitutions or laws of the several states have guaranteed U.S. citizens the right to a jury trial. This most precious and fundamental right can be waived only if the waiver is knowing and voluntary, with the courts “indulg[ing] every reasonable presumption agai