Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “United States v. Soria-Cuevas”
United States v. Lopez-Collazopublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge. In October 2014, a federal grand jury returned a one-count indictment against Agustín Lopez-Collazo, charging him with illegal reentry into the United States, without consent, after having been previously removed from the country following conviction of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b)(2). ECF 1. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
United States v. Marguet-Pilladopublic domain
648 F.3d 1001 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Jesus MARGUET-PILLADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50041. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 6, 2011. Filed August 12, 2011. *1003 Laura Duffy, Bruce R. Castetter, and Steve Miller, Office of the Uni
United States v. Smith-Baltiherpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 03-50375 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. CR-02-01867-BTM GENARO SMITH-BALTIHER, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Cou
United States v. Genaro Smith-Baltiherpublic domain
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. The issues presented include how courts should determine in a criminal proceeding whether a defendant is a citizen or an alien and whether a good faith belief that one is a citizen is enough to defeat a charge of attempted illegal entry. Genaro Smith-Baltiher was convicted of attempted reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He a
RESOLUCIÓN A la solicitud de certiorari del Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico, “no ha lugar”. La Ley Núm. 121 de 13 de octubre de 2009 (4 L.P.R.A. secs. 772 n., 773-775, 780-781, 783, 2011 y 2021) y la Ley Núm. 135 de 6 de noviembre de 2009 (4 L.P.R.A. secs. 772 n., 773-774 y 777 — 778) son un ejercicio válido de la facul-tad constitucional de la Asamblea Legislativa. Tal y como razonó el Tribunal d
Norman Evans Green v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Divisionpublic domain
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Norman Evans Green appeals from the judgment of the district court denying him a certificate of probable cause (“CPC”). Because Green has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right, we affirm. In doing so, we acknowledge the district court’s excellent opinion in this case, which should have apprised Green that his
San José Realty S.E. v. Fénix de Puerto Ricopublic domain
Opinión disidente emitida por el Juez Asociado Señor Rivera Pérez, a la cual se une el Juez Asociado Señor Co-rrada Del Río. La Mayoría revoca una sentencia emitida por el Tribunal de Circuito de Apelaciones que había confirmado otra dictada por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia en el caso ante nos. La sentencia emitida por el foro de primera ins-tancia declaró con lugar una demanda por
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV