Cases

720 S.W.2d 396 (1986) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Reynold SPULAK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 14574. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. November 24, 1986. Reynold Spulak, pro se. John Jacobs, Gainesville, for plaintiff-respondent. MAUS, Judge. The defendant was charged with trespass in the first degree. § 56

664 F.Supp. 1395 (1985) Frank L. SPULAK, Plaintiff, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 85-F-2062. United States District Court, D. Colorado. November 21, 1985. *1396 Martin Zerobnick, Richard G. Sander, Gwen J. Young, Denver, Colo., John O. Walker, Fort Collins, Colo., for plaintiff. Charles W. Newcom, M. Edward

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Frank Spulak sued K Mart Corporation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (1982), alleging that he was constructively discharged from his employment with K Mart as a result of illegal age discrimination. He also asserted a pendent state claim for age discrimination and for extreme and outrag

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent because I do not believe the district court abused its discretion in its evidentiary rulings excluding testimony. At the outset, I agree that the district court’s ruling is difficult to decipher, especially looking solely at the minute order. In the context of the trial, however, I think the court’s ruling is clear enough — the proffered testimony f

173 Cal.App.4th 740 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ DEWANDRA JOHNSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY/SPASTIC CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES AND VENTURA COUNTIES et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B198888. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. April 30, 2009. *74

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents (doc. 36). Plaintiff requests that Defendant be compelled to provide complete answers to her Opening Interrogatories and to produce documents responsive to her First Request for Production of Documents. She further requ

KESTER, J. This is a suit to rescind a deed on grounds of fraud allegedly perpetrated by the grantee-defendant, John Meyer, on the grantor-plaintiff, Edward O. Spulak. The property involved is described as tax lot 2, southeast % °f section 18, township 5 south, range 4 east, Willamette meridian, in Clackamas county, containing 158.5 acres, more or less. After the trial, and while this appeal was pending, plaintiff Spulak died, a

813 F.Supp. 1116 (1993) Adrienne G. STAIR, Plaintiff, v. LEHIGH VALLEY CARPENTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 600 OF the UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA; United Brotherhood of Carpenters Local 600 Joint Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund; James Filyac; and United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-1507. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsyl

OPINION {1} This appeal presents this Court with a matter of first impression: does the New Mexico Emancipation of Minors Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 32A-21-1 to -7 (1995) (the Act), which provides that a minor may be emancipated for “one or more purposes” set forth in the Act, see Section 32A-21-7(D), authorize a district court to declare a minor emancipated for some rathe

OPINION REBECCA BEACH SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the court on three separate motions, First, on September 29, 2016, the Defendant, Charles F. Bolden, Jr. (“the Defendant”), filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and accompanying Memorandum in Support. ECF Nos. 60, 61. On October 12, 2016, the Plaintiff, Saied Emami (“the Plaintiff’), filed a Response, ECF No. 72, and on October 17, 2016, the

JUDGE BERGER, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I, ¶ 129 'By all accounts, Brett Williams was an exemplary Colorado State Patrol (Patrol) officer. He enjoyed a meteoric rise from trooper to eaptain in. the short period of seven years. But in 2009 he decided to pursue another dream-to become a helicopter pilot-and resigned from the Patrol, At least one of

242 S.W.3d 698 (2008) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William T. WARD, Appellant, No. SC 88409. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. January 15, 2008. *700 Bernard Edelman, Steven C. Edelman, Clayton, MO, for Appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., Victor J. Melenbrink, Asst. At

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Exzetta Steele’s race and gender made her unlike any other manager in Defendant City of Topeka’s Street Maintenance and Traffic Operations Division (“Division”). No other Division manager was African-American. No other Division manager was a woman. And, according to Steele, she suffered because of these differences. Once she h

ORDER R. BROOKE JACKSON, District Judge. This order addresses plaintiffs motion for sanctions for spoliation of evidence [docket # 127] and defendant’s first motion in limine [docket # 128]. The Court has considered the motions, responses and replies. Motion for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence by Plaintiff Facts1

587 F.Supp.2d 1179 (2008) Raymond E. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-cv-01881-REB-CBS. United States District Court, D. Colorado. November 19, 2008. *1181 Derek W. Cole, Cole & Associates, Aurora, CO, Marisa L. Williams, Rhonda Lynn Rhodes, Williams & Rhodes LLP, E

871 F.Supp. 43 (1994) Winfred P. ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. Bill RICHARDSON, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 94-2546 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 20, 1994. *44 Winfred P. Adams, Farmington, NM, for plaintiff. Thomas J. Spulak, Gen. Counsel, Charlies Tiefer, Deputy Gen. Counsel & Sol. and Lenore

875 F.Supp. 121 (1995) Michael CRAFT, Sr., Plaintiff, v. Honorable Michael R. McNULTY, Defendant. No. 94-CV-1335. United States District Court, N.D. New York. January 28, 1995. *122 Michael Craft, Sr., plaintiff pro se. Office of Gen. Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC, for defendant (Thomas J. Spulak,

420 F.Supp.2d 1196 (2006) Terresa ROBERTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Art KORN, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 01-2113-CM, Civ.A. 02-2536-CM. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 1, 2006. *1197 *1198 Bernard E. Brown, James A. Rynard, Jr., The Brown Law Firm, Kansas City, MO, for Plainti

Colleen Conway Cooney, Administrative Judge. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Thomas Swink, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant-appellee, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (“RTA”). Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm. {¶ 2} This ease arose in November 2006, when Swink, a former employee of RTA, sued RTA, claiming that he had been constructively discharged and w

LOWENSTEIN, Judge. Steven Brosseit (“Brosseit”) was jury-tried and convicted of attempted second degree burglary in violation of § 569.170, RSMo. *6171994. Brosseit was sentenced as a prior offender to 5 years in prison. On appeal, Brosseit maintains that the trial court erred in (1) sustaining the prosecution’s objection to a cross-examination question of Leo Burke;