Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Ray Allen Stalcup appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana. His appeal largely focuses on the admission of hearsay statements made by an unindicted co-conspirator. He claims these statements violated his Confrontation Clause rights under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004).

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Though clouded by an airline disaster and claims of a government cover-up, this case ultimately turns on a relatively straightforward question: must the government release certain information? Plaintiff-Appellant Thomas Stalcup brought this Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) suit against the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”), seeking two documents from an

792 F.Supp. 714 (1991) Twylah STALCUP, Personal Representative of the Estate of Hallie I. Travis, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CIV-90-1731-W. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. September 20, 1991. Denver W. Meacham, II, Meacham & Meacham, Clinton, Okl., Kristen G. Juras, Church & Harris, Great Falls, Mont., for p

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

505 F.Supp.2d 704 (2007) Meh Susann STALCUP, Craig Lewis, and Sharon Lewis, Plaintiffs, v. SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, and Ingersoll-Rand Company, Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-cv-01188 REB. United States District Court, D. Colorado. January 8, 2007. Brenton Lance Chism, Brent Chism & Associates, LLC, Perry Ray Sanders, Jr., Sanders Law Firm, LLC, Lake Charles, LA,

McHugh, J. The plaintiffs are twenty-six former officers, sergeants, and lieutenants in the Boston municipal police department (BMPD) who unsuccessfully sought employment with the Boston police department (BPD) when their BMPD positions were abolished. After the city of Boston (city) rejected their transfer requests, they appealed to the Civil Service Commission (commission), claiming that G. L. c. 31, § 40, inserted by St. 1978,

Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 06-1250 DONALD D. STALCUP, Petitioner, v. PEABODY COAL COMPANY and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Respondents. ____________ Petition for Review of an

PEE CUEIAM. These appeals from judgments of conviction and sentence entered on the verdict of a jury have been heard and duly considered upon the record and upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for appellants and for the United States. The indictments herein charged conspiracy to commit a bank rob

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas denied.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1094 23-1104 JONATHAN MULLANE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD, K.J. BRUBAKER Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. D. W. B. 1 SERGEANT MAJOR (E-9), U.S. MARINE CORPS

946 F.Supp. 1271 (1996) UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. DEERING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. d/b/a Casterline Management Group, Inc., Kiest Associates Ltd. d/b/a Wendy's Restaurant and Mary Ann Ybarra, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:94-CV-1760-P. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. August 13, 1996. *1

Senior Judge MCFARLANE and Judge HOLIFIELD concur. BRUBAKER, Judge: This ease is before us on an interlocutory appeal by the United States under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862, and Rule FOR CoüRts-Martial 908, Manual FoR Courts-Martial, United States (2012 ed.). The appellee is currently charged with sodomy with a child under the age of 12 and two specifications of indecent act

492 F.2d 1244 Smarttv.Stalcup 73-1352 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 2/5/74 E.D.Tenn., 492 F.Supp. 1244 AFFIRMED

496 F.3d 1079 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Eugene BARRETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-7005. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 25, 2007. *1080 *1081 *1082 Mark Henricksen, Henricksen & Henricksen Lawy

HENRY, Chief Judge. During his thirty-year employment as a coal miner and foreman, the petitioner, Terry Gunderson, was exposed to coal dust and developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In January 2001, Mr. Gunderson received a letter from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health informing him that an x-ray taken as part of a monitoring program indicated that he suffered from pneumoconiosis, “a chr

351 P.2d 735 (1960) Lonnie B. STALCUP and Wanda L. Stalcup, husband and wife, Plaintiffs in Error, v. F.A. EASTERLY and Glenna Mae Easterly, husband and wife, Defendants in Error. No. 38559. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 16, 1960. Rehearing Denied April 19, 1960. Simpkins & Simpkins by Loy M. Simpkins, Elk City, for plaintiffs in error.

Appellee recovered a verdict and judgment of $15,000 against Stanton Lewis and S.S. Hamilton, a partnership, d/b/a The Clovis Transit Company, and James V. Ruzic, for injuries sustained by her while riding as a guest in an automobile owned and operated by Ruzic which collided with a bus leased and operated by the defendants Lewis and Hamilton. James V. Ruzic, sole appellant, varying the order of presentation, contends, that (1) there was not sufficient evidence of acts or omissions on

LEWIS, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from an order denying discharge to a voluntary bankrupt. His application for discharge and objections thereto by the trustee and creditors went to the referee as special master, who reported the facts and recommended that discharge be denied, and on hearing before the District Judge the order appealed from was entered. The objections set up are those named in Section 14 of the Bankruptcy Act