⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Sturgeon”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-05-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Case Nos. 1:21-cr-91-1-RCL, 1:21-cr-91-2-RCL CRAIG MICHAEL BINGERT and ISAAC STEVE STURGEON, Defendants. Notes for Oral Ruling from the Bench under Rule 23(c) The following are the notes that the Cour
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Case Nos. 1:21-cr-91-1-RCL, 1:21-cr-91-2-RCL CRAIG MICHAEL BINGERT and ISAAC STEVE STURGEON, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendants Craig Michael Bingert and Isaac
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-05-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Vv. Case No. 1:21-cr-91-RCL CRAIG MICHAEL BINGERT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On January 6, 2021, a violent mob attacked the United States Capitol as Congress attempted to certify the Electoral College vote. Defendants Isaac Sturgeon, Craig Bingert, and Taylor Johnatakis allegedly joined the fray and rammed a line of police officers with a metal barricade. The government charged each defendan
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993-07-29 · Published · cited 0× · 37 M.J. 1083; 1993 CMR LEXIS 387; 1993 WL 362200
ORR, Senior Judge: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by the military judge sitting alone of three unauthorized absences, twice *1085missing movements by design, and stealing an identification card and driver’s license from another Marine in violation, respectively, of Articles 86, 87, and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 8
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989-08-09 · Published · cited 0× · 887 F.2d 258; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16414; 1989 WL 119466
887 F.2d 258 U.S.v.Sturgeon (John) NO. 88-1396 United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. AUG 09, 1989 1 Appeal From: D.Me. 2 AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978-09-29 · Published · cited 0× · 584 F.2d 981
584 F.2d 981 U. S.v.Sturgeon No. 78-1073 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 9/29/78 1 D.Ariz. AFFIRMED
Sturgeon v. Frostpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 304; 202 L. Ed. 2d 14
Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
Sturgeon v. Frostpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-03-26 · Published · cited 88× · 587 U.S. 28; 139 S. Ct. 1066; 203 L. Ed. 2d 453; 2019 U.S. LEXIS 2294
Justice KAGAN delivered the opinion of the Court. This Court first encountered John Sturgeon's lawsuit three Terms ago. See Sturgeon v. Frost , 577 U. S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1061 ,
Sturgeon v. Masicapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 27; 192 L. Ed. 2d 997; 84 U.S.L.W. 3163; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4676
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
Sturgeon v. Frostpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 357; 202 L. Ed. 2d 215
Motion of Alaska for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Sturgeon v. Masicapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 702; 193 L. Ed. 2d 518; 84 U.S.L.W. 3336; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7924
Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted. Motion of Alaska for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Sturgeon v. Frostpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2016-03-22 · Published · cited 91× · 577 U.S. 424; 136 S. Ct. 1061; 194 L. Ed. 2d 108; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 2135; 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 30; 84 U.S.L.W. 4137; 46 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20057; 82 ERC (BNA) 1001
Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. For almost 40 years, John Sturgeon has hunted moose along the Nation River in Alaska. Because parts of the river are shallow and difficult to navigate, Sturgeon travels by hovercraft, an amphibious vehicle capable of gliding over land and water. To reach his preferred hunting grounds, Sturgeon must pilot his hovercraft over a s
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 562 U.S. 1292
App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-10-06 · Published · cited 1× · 768 F.3d 1066
OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: John Sturgeon (“Sturgeon”) challenges the National Park Service’s (“NPS”) enforcement of a regulation banning the operation of hovererafts on the Nation River, part of which falls within the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve. The ban prevented Sturgeon from using his personal hovercraft on his moose hunting trips on
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-10-02 · Published · cited 7× · 872 F.3d 927; 47 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20119; 2017 WL 4341742; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19020
Concurrence by Judge Nguyen OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: John Sturgeon would like to use his hovercraft in a national preserve to reach moose hunting grounds. The State of Alaska is fíne with that;1 the federal government is not. Sturgeon’s case turns on which entity—state or federal—gets to decide the matter. On remand from the Supreme Court, we again conc
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 179 L. Ed. 2d 626; 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2278; 131 S. Ct. 1687; 562 U.S. 1292; 79 U.S.L.W. 3538
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied. Same case below, 401 Ill. App. 3d 1143, 371 Ill. Dec. 289, 989 N.E.2d 1217.
Sturgeon v. Piersonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 988
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 988; 123 S. Ct. 1805
538 U.S. 988 STURGEONv.PIERSON, WARDEN. No. 02-9302. Supreme Court of United States. April 21, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. 2 C
Sturgeon v. Bentonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 533 U.S. 951; 121 S. Ct. 2595
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Sturgeon v. Bentonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 533 U.S. 951
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.