Cases

ORDER ARCARA, District Judge. This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Carol E. Heckman, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), on May 16, 1995. On July 18, 1995, defendant filed a motion to suppress. On November 20, 1995, Magistrate Judge Heckman filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that defendant’s motion be denied. This Court, having carefully reviewed Magistrate Judge Heckm

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied. Petitioner allowed until October 27, 2014, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until December 8, 2014, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of Rules of this Court.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until December 29, 2014, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Superior Court of California, Orange County, denied.

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Chun Sui Yuan, a 36-year-old Chinese citizen, applied for asylum and withholding of removal based on his asserted opposition to China’s coercive population-control policy. Central to his eligibility for relief is Yuan’s testimony that employees of a government birth-control agency assaulted him because his girlfriend had failed to attend a medical examinati

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. Horn Sui Ching moves for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Dearie, J.) transferred petitioner’s August 25, 1998 “Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241” to this Court after determining, first, that it was in re

SUMMARY ORDER Sui Xiang Zhang and Da Ming Chu, through counsel, petition for review of the BIA decision affirming decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) William F. Jankun denying their claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history. This Court reviews the agency’s factual findings u

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied. Petitioners allowed until October 27, 2014, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

SUMMARY ORDER Min Sui Chen, through counsel, petitions for review of the BIA’s order affirming the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) that denied Chen’s claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Chen alleged she feared persecution in China because of her opposition to Chinese family planning policies. The IJ found Chen failed to meet her burden of proof and, there

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. Sui Kang Li, pro se, petitions for review of an order of the BIA affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Ag