Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Swett”
Swett Urquieta v. Bowepublic domain
24-1407-cv Swett Urquieta v. Bowe United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term, 2024 (Argued: September 10, 2024 Decided: October 31, 2024) Docket No. 24-1407-cv _____________________________________ MARIA ELENA SWETT URQUIETA, Petitioner-Ap
Swett v. Statepublic domain
KAUTZ, Justice. [¶ 1] A jury found Robert C. Swett guilty of aggravated child abuse. He claims the district court erred by allowing the State to present testimony about an altercation he had in jail while awaiting trial in this case. We conclude the district court abused its discretion by admitting the evidence; however, Mr. Swett was not prejudiced by the error. Consequently, we affirm. ISSUE <
Delaney v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant the United States of America (“government”). For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the government’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On February 24, 2012, Kalvin Hunt (“Hunt”), a Marine on involuntary leave while appealing his dishono
Segovia v. United Statespublic domain
MANION, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, former residents of Illinois now residing in the United States territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands challenge federal and state statutes that do not allow them to obtain absentee ballots for federal elections in Illinois. Generally, federal and state law require that former residents living outside of the United States who retain their U.S. citizenship receive such b
United States v. Swettpublic domain
FOX, District Judge. The jury having found the defendants guilty upon the sixth count in this indictment, they have filed a motion in arrest of judgment thereon. The federal courts have not jurisdiction to punish offences against the United States, which have not been previously defined and a specific punishment affixed by some statute of the United States. The crime must be so declared by act of congress and juri
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2023 VT 26
Swett v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #17) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. # 18) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF, AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT; TERMINATION ENTRY WALTER HE
Swett v. Bradburypublic domain
43 P.3d 1094 (2002) 333 Or. 597 Michael SWETT; David Fidanque; and the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc., Respondents on Review, v. Bill BRADBURY, Secretary of State, and the State of Oregon, Petitioners on Review, and Virginia Markell, Laurence Perry, and Susan Remmers, Intervenors-Respondents. (CC 98-C-20484; CA A107552 (Control), A107799; SC S48116). Supreme
State of Tennessee v. Raymond Lee Swett, Jr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 11, 2012 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RAYMOND LEE SWETT, JR. Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2009-C-2869 Steve Dozier, Judge No. M2011-00439-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 4, 2013 The defendant, Raymond Lee Swett, Jr., appeals his Davidson County Criminal Court jury convi
State v. Swettpublic domain
EDMONDS, J. On appeal, the state seeks reversal of the trial court’s pretrial orders granting defendant’s motion in limine to exclude the victim’s testimony and dismissing the charge of harassment against defendant. ORS 138.060(1), (3). We reverse. After police responded to a domestic disturbance at their residence, defendant was charged with harassing his girlfriend. ORS 166.065.1
Brown v. Swett & Crawford of Texas, Inc.public domain
178 S.W.3d 373 (2005) Braden St. John BROWN, Appellant, v. SWETT & CRAWFORD OF TEXAS, INC. f/d/b/a/ Insurance Brokers Services, Inc. of Texas f/k/a Alexaner Howden Insurance Services of Texas, Inc.; Aon Corporation; Aon Services Group, Inc.; Swett & Crawford, Inc.; Insurance Brokers Services, Inc.; Pascal M. ("Matt") Galtney; and Blake Bartnik, Appellees. No. 01-03-00520-CV. Court of Appeals of
Swett v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Centerpublic domain
EISMANN, Justice. Wm. Breck Seiniger, Jr., as the real party in interest, appeals the award of attorney fees made to his client Bonnie Swett by the Industrial Commission. We affirm the award. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The claimant Bonnie Swett was injured while working for the St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center. She filed a claim under the Worker’s Compensa
Swett v. ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MED. CTR.public domain
29 P.3d 385 (2001) 136 Idaho 74 Bonnie SWETT, Claimant, and Wm. Breck Seiniger, Jr., Real Party in Interest-Appellant, v. ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Employer, and Continental Casualty Company, Surety, Defendants-Respondents. No. 26216. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, February 2001 Term. May 11, 2001. Rehearing Denied Augus
United States v. Torrespublic domain
19-4208-cr (L) United States v. Torres et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: April 21, 2021 Decided: November 17, 2021) Docket Nos. 19-4208-cr, 19-4231-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Swett v. Haig's, Inc.public domain
663 A.2d 930 (1995) Tanya SWETT v. HAIG'S, INC., Defendant and Third-party Plaintiff v. Eric JENSEN, Third-party Defendant. No. 94-049. Supreme Court of Vermont. June 2, 1995. Motion for Reargument Denied July 5, 1995. J. Norman O'Connor and William W. Adams of Donovan & O'Connor, Adams, MA, for third-party plaintiff-appellant. Sh
United States v. Purcellpublic domain
19-238-cr United States of America v. Purcell UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 Argued: February 6, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020 Docket No. 19-238-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Opinion issued September 15, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The
Holcombe v. United Statespublic domain
XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this date, the Court considered the Government's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (docket no. 28), Plaintiffs' response (docket no. 44), the Government's reply (docket no. 45), Plaintiffs' sur-reply (docket no. 51), and the Government's sur-sur-reply (docket no. 52). After careful consideration, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the Government's motion.
Swett v. Martinpublic domain
Per Curiam. The plaintiff brought this action to establish the paternity of her two minor children. Since the plaintiff was a recipient of public assistance, the attorney general appeared on behalf of the state. The defendant filed a special defense, claiming that the action was barred by the three year statute of limitations set forth in General Statutes § 46^160,1 because both children were born mo
Purcell v. United Statespublic domain
23-6985-pr Purcell v. United States United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2024 Argued: February 13, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025 No. 23-6985-pr LAVELLOUS PURCELL, AKA KING CASINO, AKA MIKE HILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v.