Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Swindell”
United States v. Swindellpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Tyree J. Swindell appeals from the district court’s judgment and 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Swindell has filed a brief stating that there
United States v. Swindellpublic domain
GILLIAM, District Judge. The above-entitled action against the defendants, Henry Lee Swindell, Sammie G. Spencer and Ray M. Spencer, doing business as S. G. Spencer & Son, came on regularly for trial at Washington, North Carolina, on the 23rd day of October, 1957, and the Court having duly considered the pleadings, stipulations, and evidence and being fully advised in the premises, now finds these facts:
Cannon v. Swindellpublic domain
537 U.S. 1159 CANNONv.SWINDELL ET AL. No. 02-745. Supreme Court of United States. January 21, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. 2 C.
Cannon v. Swindellpublic domain
538 U.S. 940 CANNONv.SWINDELL ET AL. No. 02-745. Supreme Court of United States. March 24, 2003. 1 Petition for rehearing denied. 537 U. S. 1159.
Cannon v. Swindellpublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
State v. Swindellpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-113 No. 294A21-1 Filed 4 November 2022 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HAROLD EUGENE SWINDELL Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 278 N.C. App. 758, 2021-NCCOA-408, finding prejudicial error
State v. Swindellpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-113 No. 294A21-1 Filed 4 November 2022 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HAROLD EUGENE SWINDELL Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 278 N.C. App. 758, 2021-NCCOA-408, finding prejudicial error
State v. Swindellpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-408 No. COA20-263 Filed 3 August 2021 Bladen County, Nos. 17 CRS 50608; 17 CRS 50609 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. HAROLD EUGENE SWINDELL, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgments entered 27 November 2018 by Judge Jeffery K. Carpenter in Bladen Coun
State v. Swindellpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-113 No. 294A21-1 Filed 4 November 2022 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HAROLD EUGENE SWINDELL Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 278 N.C. App. 758, 2021-NCCOA-408, finding prejudicial error
State v. Swindellpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-408 No. COA20-263 Filed 3 August 2021 Bladen County, Nos. 17 CRS 50608; 17 CRS 50609 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. HAROLD EUGENE SWINDELL, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgments entered 27 November 2018 by Judge Jeffery K. Carpenter in Bladen Coun
Swindell v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.public domain
*1227ante, p. 820; 534 U. S. 917; ante, p. 88; ante, p. 1044; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 853; *1228No. 01-1
Swindell v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.public domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Swindell v. Florida East Coast Railway Copublic domain
537 U.S. 820 SWINDELLv.FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. No. 01-1756. Supreme Court of United States. October 7, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. 2
Kenneth Bailey v. Shawn T. Swindellpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 21-14454 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 01/08/2024 Page: 1 of 21 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14454 ____________________ KENNETH BAILEY,
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: The issue in this case is whether the stop of appellants’ vehicle was reasonable under the fourth amendment. The district court upheld the stop on the ground that officers had reasonable suspicion that the appellants were smuggling drugs, and denied appellants’ motions to suppress. On appeal, the government
537 U.S. 1227 SWINDELLv.FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO., ante, p. 820. No. 01-1756. Supreme Court of United States. February 24, 2003. 1 Petition for rehearing denied.
Kenneth Bailey v. Shawn T. Swindellpublic domain
Case: 18-13572 Date Filed: 10/16/2019 Page: 1 of 16 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-13572 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:15-cv-00390-MCR-CJK KENNETH BAILEY,
ORTHOPEDIC RESOURCES, INC. v. Swindellpublic domain
329 S.W.3d 70 (2010) ORTHOPEDIC RESOURCES, INC. and JTW Medical Products, Inc., Appellants, v. Kara SWINDELL and Jeremy Swindell, Appellees. No. 05-09-01543-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. November 8, 2010. Rehearing Overruled December 21, 2010. *71 Chris R. Norris, Joseph A. Barbknecht, Laci Dreher, The B
Swindell-Filiaggi v. CSX Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND BAYLSON, District Judge. I. Introduction This diversity case raises an issue that has divided courts in this District. Plaintiffs have moved to remand this action to state court on the basis of the “forum defendant rule,” 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2). The forum defendant rule provides that an action cannot be removed on the basis of dive
OMJ Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. From 1976 until 1996, section 936 of the Internal Revenue Code made available to U.S. corporations a tax credit fully offsetting the federal tax owed on income earned in the operation of any trade or business in Puerto Rico. In 1996, Congress enacted the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-188, 110 Stat. 1755, setting in motion the c