Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2005 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Tan Fong Vang D

673 F.3d 1259 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TAN DUC NGUYEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-50061. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 12, 2012. Filed March 23, 2012. *1261 H. Dean Steward, San Clemente, CA, for the appellant. Erin H. Flynn (arg

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. The United States brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731 challenging the district court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order (“Order”) granting Defendant Raymond Tan’s Motion in Li-mine Regarding Other Cases and Charges (“Motion in Limine”) which sought the exclusion of evidence of Defendant’s prior drunk driving convictions.

109 F.Supp.2d 1328 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Raymond TAN, Defendants. No. 00-13 LH. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. August 2, 2000. *1329 Miles Hanisee, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. Ray R. Twohig, Jr., Albuquerque, NM, for Defendants. MEMORAND

MEMORANDUM ** Tan Minh Ly appeals his convictions and 151-month sentence for four counts of distribution and possession with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Ly has filed a brief *231

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF No. 20-56399 AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-02165-JVS-ADS v. BEN GHEE TAN, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

TREVOR N. MCFADDEN, U.S.D.J. *125Tai Nguyen is charged with bulk cash smuggling, failure to file a currency report, and knowingly making false statements to government investigators. Ahead of his trial, Mr. Nguyen moved to suppress the statements he made to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") agents during two interviews conducted

674 F.3d 103 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. SENG TAN, a/k/a Seng Kim Srun, a/k/a Seng Srunk, Defendant, Appellant. No. 10-2091. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard December 7, 2011. Decided March 23, 2012. *104 Joshua L. Gordon, with whom Law Office of Joshua L. Gordon was on brief

762 F.Supp.2d 1353 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, v. JOHN DENNIS TAN ONG, Defendant. Criminal Case No. 1:10-CR-352-01-JEC. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. December 22, 2010. *1354 Tracia M. King, James R. McHenry, III, U.S. Attorney's Office, Atlanta, GA, for United States of America. John A

MEMORANDUM ** We have jurisdiction to consider the government’s notice of appeal in Case No. 07-50161 because the matter being appealed was civil in nature, and therefore the time for filing an appeal under Rule 4(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure applied. Although the plain language of Rule 4 directs us to consider only whether the “judgment or order appealed from” is entered in a “civil

MEMORANDUM * Appellant Phu Tan Luong appeals his conviction in the district court for 35 counts of healthcare fraud and aiding and abetting, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1347, 2(a) and (b), and five counts of money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1957. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here, except as necessary to explain our decision. We affirm Luong’s conviction. I. Entitle

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

SUMMARY ORDER Julianto Sanioso Tan, through counsel, petitions for review of the BIA decision affirming Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Jeffrey Chase’s pretermission of his asylum application and denial of his application for withholding of removal and for relief under Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history.

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Jessie Santana Tan, a native and citizen of Indonesia, seeks review of an October 30, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the July 2, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Thomas J. Mulligan, pretermitting her asylum application and denying her application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Jessie Santana Tan, No. A99 686 971 (B.I.A. Oc

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Jessie Santana Tan, a native and citizen of Indonesia, seeks review of an October 30, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the July 2, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Thomas J. Mulligan, pretermitting her asylum application and denying her application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Jessie Santana Tan, No. A99 686 971 (B.I.A. Oc

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

SUMMARY ORDER Tan Lin, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review *676of a November 6, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the April 5, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Robert Weisel, which denied his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Tan Lin, No. A09

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Tan Jin Yu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of an August 11, 2006 order of the BIA affirming the March 30, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“U”) Paul A. Defonzo denying Yu’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Tan Jin Yu, No. A79 415 353 (B.I.A. Aug. 11, 2006), aff'g No