Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, STEWART, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Cohdie A. TAVARES Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, Verissimo Tavares appeals both the conviction and his sentence. He claims that the district court erred in admitting improper and prejudicial expert testimony concerning the absence of fingerprints on the gun that the jury found Tavares to have possessed. He also claims that the district court erred in i

*49 TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants John O’Brien, Elizabeth Tavares, and William Burke, appeal their convictions for Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) violations, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), RICO conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, based on their

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. After serving a sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, Tavares Montgomery began serving three years of supervised release. The U.S. Probation Office filed a petition to revoke supervised release, alleging that Montgomery had violated many conditions, including use of controlled substances. After a hearing, the district court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. After a jury trial, Darryl Tavares and Eddie Jones were both convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 371 of conspiracy to knowingly transport an individual in interstate commerce with the intent that such individual engage in prostitution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (Count One). Mr. Tavares was also convicted of knowingly transporting a minor, B.B., across state l

OPINION PER CURIAM: Tavares Chandler pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing, the district court concluded that Chandler had been convicted of three “violent felonies,” as defined by the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), and sentenced Chandler to a term of 235 months’ imprisonment. Chandler does not contest his extensive criminal hist

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Ulysses Tavares appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal. Tavares was sentenced to the mandatory minimum sentence required by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). We have held that sentences ba

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Ulysses Tavares appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal. Tavares was sentenced to the mandatory minimum sentence required by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). We have held that sentences ba

STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge. Fredrico Tavares was convicted in 2002 on one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He now appeals the district court’s admission into evidence of certain tape-recorded conversations he had with a confidential government informant. He also challenges the district court’s application of a four-point increase to his offense level under the

MEMORANDUM ** Manuel Tavares-Ramires appeals from the sentence imposed upon him following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. We reject Tavares-Ramires’s contention that the supervised release statute violates the Constitution. See United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220, 1225 (9th Cir.2006).

*998 ORDER Frank Tavares appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). In 2001, Tavares pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocai

166 F.Supp.2d 903 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, v. Danny TAVARES, Defendant. No. 88 Cr 903. United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 11, 2001. *904 Goldstein, Weinstein & Fuld, Bronx, NY, for defendant, of counsel, David J. Goldstein. Memorandum and Order STANTON, District Judge.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-1139 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for th

USCA1 Opinion [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 98-1093 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. DANIEL D. TAVARES, Defendant, Appellant

USCA1 Opinion September 3, 1996 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 96-1763 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v.

USCA1 Opinion [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 97-1842 UNITED STATES, Appellee,

USCA1 Opinion [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 96-2247 UNITED STATES, Appellee,

USCA1 Opinion July 8, 1996 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 95-1403 UNITED STATES,

132 F.3d 45 U.S.v.Tavares* NO. 95-4502 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Nov 25, 1997 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No.9400031CRDTKH 1 Reversed in part, Vacated in part. <

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. An early-morning assault in Mashpee, Massachusetts, on August 29, 1991, resulted in a chase through nearby woods and the arrest of Daniel D. Tavares. On May 15, 1992, Tavares was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), the felon in possession of a firearm statute. Tavares appealed, and this court, sitting en banc, reversed his convictio