Cases

585 F.Supp.2d 327 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Humberto Pepin TAVERAS, also known as "Tony" and "Luis Rosario," Defendant. No. 04-CR-156 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. November 5, 2008. *329 Louis M. Freeman, Freeman, Nooter & Ginsberg, New York, NY, for Defendant. Carter H. Burwell, Lee Jos

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Humberto Pepin TAVERAS, also known as "Tony" and "Luis Rosario", Defendant. No. 04-CR-156 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 4, 2008. SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SELF DEFENSE JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I. Introduction Defendant Humberto Pepin T

584 F.Supp.2d 535 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Humberto Pepin TAVERAS, also known as "Tony" and "Luis Rosario," Defendant. No. 04-CR-156 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. November 4, 2008. *536 Carter H. Burwell, Lee Joshua Freedman, Walter M. Norkin, United States Attorneys Office, Brooklyn, NY, for Unit

488 F.Supp.2d 246 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Humberto Pepin TAVERAS, also known as "Tony" and "Luis Rosario," Defendant. No. 04-156 (S-4). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 6, 2007. *247 *248 Lee Joshua Freedman, United States Attorneys Office, Brooklyn, NY, for United

424 F.Supp.2d 446 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Humberto Pepin TAVERAS, Defendant. No. 04-CR-156 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 16, 2006. *447 Roslynn Mauskopf, United States Attorney, by: Morris Fodeman, Lee Freedman, Brooklyn, NY, for the United States of America. Freeman, Nooter & Gin

MEMORANDUM & ORDER ON MENTAL HEALTH EVIDENCE WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. In this capital prosecution, the government has moved for an order requiring defendant to undergo a mental health examination by a government expert. The motion is denied with leave to renew. I. Facts On October 31, 2005 the government moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

436 F.Supp.2d 493 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Humberto Pepin TAVERAS, Defendant. No. 04-CR-156 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 29, 2006. *494 United States Attorney's Office, by Lee Freedman, Morris Fodeman, Brooklyn, NY, for United States. Freeman, Nooter & Ginsberg, by Louis Freeman, L

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a sentence imposed pursuant to the federal sentencing guidelines. The underlying case arose out of a two-count superseding indictment that charged defendant-appellant Juan Taveras with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine base and a detectable amount of heroin (count 1) and distribution of five grams or

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Jimmy Taveras challenges the district court’s revocation of his supervised release without giving him the opportunity to confront the complaining witness whose account of an alleged violation of state law was the basis of the court’s revocation decision. Instead, the court relied on Tav-eras’s probation officer to present a hearsay account of the alleged viol

133 F.Supp.2d 298 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, v. Luis TAVERAS, Defendant. No. 99 CR. 802(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 1, 2001. *299 Mary Jo White, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York by Steven R. Peikin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, New York City, for the United States of Amer

12 F.3d 218 U.S.v.Taveras** NO. 92-4072 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec 17, 1993 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER EDELSTEIN, District Judge: On May 30, 1991, Flavio Taveras was convicted on seven counts following a jury trial held before this Court. Taveras was convicted of four narcotics crimes, including: (1) conspiracy to distribute more than one kilogram of cocaine and more than fifty grams of crack in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; (2) possession with intent to distribute and distribution of

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. In this appeal from a denial of a coram nobis petition, defendant-appellant Vincent F. Castro-Taveras (“Castro”) argues that his guilty plea entered more than a decade ago should be vacated because of Fifth and Sixth Amendment violations. Castro asserts that (i) his counsel provided ineffective assistance in erroneously advising him that a guilty plea would n

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

SUMMARY ORDER Rogelio Figueroa-Taveras appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Patterson, J.). The conviction was entered pursuant to Figueroa-Taveras’s guilty plea on a single charged count of illegally reentering the United States — without having obtained permission for readmission as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2) — after having been

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge: Orlando Fernandez Taveras petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) June 2012 order of removal. The removal order was based on two convictions for petty larceny, both crimes of moral turpitude under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). The BIA rejected Fernandez Taveras’s argument

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

432 F.Supp.2d 140 (2006) Juan TAVERAS, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil No. 06-07-B-S. Criminal No. 03-02-B-S. United States District Court, D. Maine. May 12, 2006. June 1, 2006. *141 Juan Taveras, FCI Ray Brook, Ray Brook, NY, Pro se. Margaret D. McGaughey, U.S. Attorney's Office, P

SUMMARY ORDER The United States appeals from an order entered by the district court dismissing an indictment charging Figueroa-Taveras with illegal re-entry into the United *503States pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the reasons stated below, we vacate and remand for further proceedings. To warrant dismissal of an indictment for illegal re-entry, an alien mus