Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Terry Allen Garnette”
United States v. Terry Allen Garnettepublic domain
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Terry Allen Garnette pleaded guilty to one count of producing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and one count of distributing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). The District Court 1 calculated Garnette’s advisory sentencing- guidelines range as 180 to 210
United States v. Terry Allen Garnettepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1053 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court
Campa v. United Statespublic domain
300 F.3d 1361 Joseph C. CAMPA, Wayne S. Airmet, Mario P. Alfonsi, Randolph P. Allen, Steven R. Allison, James P. Anderson, Michael L. Anderson, John M. Archield, Johnny D. Ayo, Richard D. Ballas, Donald G. Baker, Robert L. Baltzer, Robert E. Barb, Michael K. Barber, Marya M. Bard, William D. Barker, Richard C. Beaman, Lee R. Beard, David W. Bearden, Lisa Mara Bell, Robert D. Bell, Scott W. Beyer, Michael G. Birdsong, Ricky A. Blakely, Betty Borders
Campa v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs Joseph Campa and 367 other former Air Force Officers appeal from a *1364summary judgment by the United States Court of Federal Claims holding that (1) precedent foreclosed Plaintiffs’ claims that, as implemented, the Air Force promotion board system — under which Plaintiffs did not obtain a promotion in rank and thus had to separate from the
United States v. Babiloniapublic domain
CHIN, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Roger Key appeals from a judgment of the district court (Stein, J.) convicting him of, inter alia, conspiracy to commit murder-for-hire and several drug- and firearm-related offenses. Key principally challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for participating in the murder-for-hire conspiracy targeting Terry Harrison and the admission at tria
United States v. Babiloniapublic domain
14‐3739‐cr (L) United States v. Babilonia UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2016 (Argued: September 29, 2016 Decid
Childs v. United Statespublic domain
760 A.2d 614 (2000) Jamal CHILDS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 00-CO-52. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 26, 2000. Decided October 12, 2000. *615 Timothy P. O'Toole, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein, Public Defender Service, was on the brief for appellant. <
418 S.E.2d 648 (1992) 332 N.C. 1 ROWAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO. No. 339A91. Supreme Court of North Carolina. July 17, 1992. *650 Woodson, Linn, Sayers, Lawther, Short & Wagoner by Donald D. Sayers, Salisbury, Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole by Edward J. Westb
Brown v. United Statespublic domain
342 F.Supp. 987 (1972) Levon BROWN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants. No. LR-71-C-78. United States District Court, E. D. Arkansas, W. D. May 10, 1972. *988 *989 John T. Lavey, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiff. Robert J. Brown, Chief Deputy Pros. Atty., Pulaski
Morrilton School District No. 32 v. United Statespublic domain
HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The United States brought this civil action on December 27,1972, pursuant to Section 407 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000c-6, to desegregate the public schools of Conway County, Arkansas. Named as defendants were the State of Arkansas, the Arkansas State Board of Education and its members, the Director of Education of Arkansas, the Conway County Board of Education and its members and s
Morrilton School District No. 32 v. United Statespublic domain
606 F.2d 222 CA 79-3281 MORRILTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 32, Terry A.Humble, Superintendent, W. O. Byrd, Dr. H. B. White, Hugh C.Jones, W. C. Maxwell, Earle Love, William Cheek, Members,Plumerville School District No. 39, Doyle Border,Superintendent, William P. Evans, Jack Gordon, Frank Deaver,Charles Townsley, Billy Garrett, Members, Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 79-1293.
Terry v. Cutlerpublic domain
Conclusions of Fact. — There is no statement of facts contained in the record, and the conclusions of the court below are adopted as the conclusions of this court (except the fifteenth and twentieth, as follows: "1. Under an agreement made in open court, the land in controversy is worth, not including the improvements, $3600. The improvements in the aggregate are worth $2900, to-wit: W.T. Cutler, $1000; A.H. Shirley, $600; Shirley Platt, $600; Dave Platt, $300; Reinhardt
State v. Pasterchikpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Pasterchik, 2023-Ohio-4252.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 1-22-50 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. MICHAEL T. PASTERCHIK, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF OHIO,
State v. Leepublic domain
McGEE, Chief Judge. *765 Gyrell Shavonta Lee ("Defendant") appeals his conviction for second-degree murder. Defendant contends that the trial court erred by: (1) omitting a no duty to retreat instruction from its jury instructions; (2) instructing the jury it could find Defendant was the ini
708 F.Supp.2d 1284 (2010) Terri TOMLINSON, Plaintiff, v. COMBINED UNDERWRITERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 08-CV-259-TCK (FHM). United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. April 9, 2010. *1285 Eric James Begin, Jon Douglas Starr, McGivern Gilliard Curthoys, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff. James W. Connor, Jr
Jones v. Statepublic domain
3 A.3d 465 (2010) 194 Md. App. 110 Emmanuel L. JONES v. STATE of Maryland. No. 918, September Term, 2008. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 1, 2010. *468 Lyndon P. Dreven of Washington D.C. (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender, Howrey, LLP, on the brief), for the appellant. Douglas D. Gu
City of Golden Valley v. Wiebesickpublic domain
DISSENT ANDERSON, Justice (dissenting). Today, the court holds that, so long as the city has a reasonable standard for choosing the homes to be searched, city officials can search a home without any suspicion of wrongdoing. The Supreme Court of the United States has held that similar searches do not violate the Fourth Amendment. Camara v. Mun. Court, 387 U.S. 523, 87 S.Ct. 1727, 18
Garcia v. Hartford Police Departmentpublic domain
PER CURIAM: In a matter involving employment discrimination and First Amendment retaliation claims, Plaintiff-Appellant Edwin Garcia appeals from a September 27, 2011 final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Thompson, C.J.), granting summary judgment to the Defendants-Appellees. Garcia, a former sergeant with the Cit
State of Tennessee v. Zachary Rye Adamspublic domain
09/09/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 7, 2022 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ZACHARY RYE ADAMS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardin County No. 17-CR-10 C. Creed McGinley, Judge No. W2020-01208-CCA-R3-CD The D
Guerrero v. Deanepublic domain
750 F.Supp.2d 631 (2010) Esperanza GUERRERO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Charlie T. DEANE, et al., Defendants. No. 1:09cv1313 (JCC). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 27, 2010. *638 Robert H. Cox, Ann Marie Phillips, Howrey LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. M. Alice Rowan, Angela Lemmo