Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Tingas”
United States v. Valentino Johnsonpublic domain
OPINION TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: Valentino Johnson was convicted as a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) & 924(e), after an emergency 911 call reporting an attempted suicide led San Francisco police' to discover a handgun at the apartment where Johnson was temporarily staying
United States v. Maxwellpublic domain
247 F.Supp.2d 10 (2002) UNITED STATES of America v. Peggy L. MAXWELL No. CR. 01-10446-MLW. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 24, 2002. *11 Bernard Grossberg, Boston, MA, Barry S. Pollack, Donnelly, Conroy & Gelharr, LLC, Boston, MA, for Eduardo G. Mcintosh. Barry S. Pollack, Donnelly, Conroy &
Timothy S. Nickels v. Statepublic domain
KITE, Justice. [T1] Timothy S. Nickels was convicted by a jury of strangulation of a household member. He claims the district court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of battery. We conclude the *290 district court properly refused the lesser included offense instr
Gregory M. Toth v. Statepublic domain
FOX, Justice. * [11] Gregory M. Toth waited outside a gas station, trying to get a ride out of Gillette, Wyoming, on a cold fall morning in October 2018. As luck would have it, Ivan Aguilar pulled up in a pickup and left it running while he went inside. Mr. Toth got in and drove off, intending to drive south until the truc
Woyak v. Statepublic domain
BURKE, Justice, dissenting. [¶ 28] I respectfully dissent. The majority reverses Defendant's five felony convie-tions on the basis that he had "the right to be present at the competency/taint hearing under the cireumstances of this case." I disagree. Defendant has not established that he had the right, constitutional or otherwise, to be present at the hearing. In addition, I am troubled by the lack of meaning
Phillip v. Statepublic domain
VOIGT, Chief Justice. [11] Jason Gerald Phillip (the appellant) was involved in a bar fight, during which he bit off a piece of a fellow patron's ear. As a result of this incident, he was charged with and convicted of aggravated assault and battery. On appeal, he claims that the district court erred in instructing the jury regarding an aggressor's forfeiture of a self-defense claim, asserting that there was no evidence showi
Daniel George Swan v. The State of Wyomingpublic domain
HILL, Justice. [T1] A jury found Daniel Swan guilty of one count of felony child abuse, and he now appeals. He claims that the district court erred by not granting his motion for judgment of acquittal, citing insufficient evidence. He also claims that his right to confrontation was violated because the district court limited questions to the victim regarding inappropriate sexual c
Shea v. Clintonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Before the Court is the defendant’s Motion to Amend Answer, Sept. 20, 2012, ECF No. 129. Upon consideration of the motion, the *3 plaintiffs Opposition, Sept. 24, 2012, ECF No. 130, the defendant’s Reply thereto, Oct
Warner v. Statepublic domain
28 P.3d 21 (2001) 2001 WY 67 Thomas Eugene WARNER, a/k/a Thomas Rodriguez, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 00-27. Supreme Court of Wyoming. August 1, 2001. Rehearing Denied August 2, 2001. *23 Sylvia Lee Hackl, State Public Defender; Donna D. Domon
Hardrick v. Government of the District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CORTEZ HARDRICK Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-2151 (TJK) GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF CO- LUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Cortez Hardrick sued the District of Columbia for several common-law torts and constitu- tional violations tha
City of New York v. Curriepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Charles E. Ramos, J. This holdover proceeding concerns novel issues involving restrictions on the manner in which tenant’s associations may manage buildings leased to them by the City of New York. This proceeding was instituted in the name of the City of New York but the real party in interest is a tenant’s association which may soon own the premises 314-316-318 We
Tanoh v. Dow Chemical Co.public domain
561 F.3d 945 (2009) Aka Raymond TANOH; Assye Eugene Tanoh; Otchoumou Jean Marie Tanoh; Tiraogopaul Taonsa; Issiaka Jean Pierre Tapsoba; Noraogo Salfo Tarbagdo; Noaga Tarihidiga; Sanoyo Tidiane; Berte Tiecoura; Traore Tiediougou; Kalifa Traore; Kone Tiegbe; Issa Traore; Noraogo Michel Tiendrebego; Zani Togola; Tomindreu Philippe Toman; Ouambi Tonde; Lalle Tougouma; Abou Dramane Traore; Adame Traore; Arouna Traore Boureima Traore; Daouda Traore; Lancine Tr
Mench Fleck v. Mangual Gonzálezpublic domain
La Jueza Presidenta Señora Naveira Merly emitió la opinión del Tribunal. En esta ocasión nos corresponde atender un delicado as-pecto del trámite procesal seguido ante el Tribunal de Pri-mera Instancia, en un procedimiento de exequátur, para determinar si el antiguo Tribunal de Circuito de Apelacio-nes de Puerto Rico (Tribunal de Apelaciones) actuó correc-tamente al concederle entera fe y crédito a una sentencia q
Tanoh v. Dow Chemical Companypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AKA RAYMOND TANOH; ASSYE EUGENE TANOH; OTCHOUMOU JEAN MARIE TANOH; TIRAOGOPAUL TAONSA; ISSIAKA JEAN PIERRE TAPSOBA; NORAOGO SALFO TARBAGDO; NOAGA TARIHIDIGA; SANOYO TIDIANE; BERTE TIECOURA; TRAORE TIEDIOUGOU; KALIFA TRAORE; KONE TIEGBE; ISSA TRAORE; NORAOGO MICHEL TIENDREBEGO; ZANI TOGOLA; TOMINDREU PHILIPPE TOMAN; OUAMBI TONDE; LALLE TOUGOUMA; No. 09-55138 ABOU DRAMANE TRAORE; ADAME
Gallimore v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurancepublic domain
126 Cal.Rptr.2d 560 (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 1388 Ronald GALLIMORE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants and Respondents. Nos. B147937, B156219. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Three. October 22, 2002. Review Denied January 29, 2003.
Bartrum v. Grant County Office of Family & Childrenpublic domain
*525OPINION RILEY, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE - Appellants-Respondents, Patrice Bart-rum ("Mother") and William Bartrum ("Father") (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Parents"), appeal the trial court's order terminating the parent-child relationship between the Parents and their two (2) youngest children, J.B. and W.B.
In re Muñoz Francopublic domain
per curiam: El Lie. Lorenzo Muñoz Franco fue admitido al ejercicio de la abogacía el 3 de jimio de 1968 y al ejercicio de la notaría el 23 de enero de 1970. El 24 de mayo de 2002 el representante legal de Muñoz Franco compareció por escrito y nos informó que dicho abogado había resultado convicto ante el Tribunal de Distrito de Estados Unidos para el Distrito de Puerto Rico.(1) En ese momento se nos i
In Re Seisaypublic domain
61 B.R. 940 (1986) In re Tinga Khendeka SEISAY, Gunilla Elizabeth Seisay, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 84 B 20252. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. June 17, 1986. *941 Miller & Arnow, Levittown, N.Y., for Gary Bernard, Inc. Thomas J. Romans, P.C., Hackensack, N.J., for debtors. DECISION ON MOTION SEEKING AN ORD
OPINION ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge. In 1995 Plaintiff Kalamazoo River Study Group (“KRSG”) filed this action against eight corporations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., the Michigan Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (“NREPA”), M.C.L.A. § 324.20101 et seq. and v
54 Cal.App.4th 625 (1997) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; RODERICK TAYLOR et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. B106120. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. April 22, 1997. *630 COUNSEL Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss,