⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. To”

United States v. Topublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998-06-23 · Published · cited 48× · 144 F.3d 737; 1998 WL 329386
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________________ No. 96-3045 ________________________________ D.C. Docket No. 94-293-Cr-T-17E UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASTE-TO-ENERGY ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-2726 (JEB) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Waste-to-Energy Association, a trade organization representing municipal incinerator op
District Court, E.D. New York · 1988-12-02 · Published · cited 2× · 701 F. Supp. 45; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14137; 1988 WL 131895
701 F.Supp. 45 (1988) UNITED STATES of America v. TO RAY TAN, and Ming Hoi Wong, Defendants. No. 88 CR 93. United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 2, 1988. *46 Andrew J. Maloney, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y. (Thomas P. Milton, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), for U.S. Jeanne B. Philby, New York City, for To Ray Tan.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-11-09 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASTE-TO-ENERGY ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-2726 (JEB) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Waste-to-Energy Association, a national trade organization representing municipal entities and compa
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-3505 (RDM) UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) is “designed ‘to pierce the ve
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
§ELE® UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FEB 2 7 20?8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C' k er ,U.S. District& B k Courts for the District ogl(])or|iii)ril:)ila Dwight W. l\/ICGL. Gaskin, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. 18-29 (UNA) Embassy of Canada et al., § Defendants. § ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pa-uperis. The Court Will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject mat
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-05-07 · Published · cited 29× · 924 F.3d 155
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Qui tam relators Deborah Lemon, Sarah Diaz, Eric Castillo, and Laverne Fowler appeal the district court's dismissal of their False Claims Act (FCA) suit on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion against several hospice organizations owned and operated by Walter Crowder. The district court found the fraudulent claims, as alleged, immaterial. We disagree and therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2024-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, October 31, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25A0503. UNITED STATES FUELING COMPANY, LLC v. REGIONS BANK, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC. Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is release
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010-02-24 · Published · cited 2× · 424 B.R. 251; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16606; 2010 WL 681400
424 B.R. 251 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. CAMP COAST TO COAST, INC., and Affinity Group, Inc., Appellee. No. 4:09 CV 1439. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 24, 2010. *253 Douglas Snoeyenbos, U.S. Justice Dept., Washington, DC, for appellant. Michael A. Gallo, Nadler Nadl
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017-10-19 · Published · cited 5× · 283 F. Supp. 3d 476
T. S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge In this breach of contract and Miller Act1 case, plaintiff, a subcontractor on a government contract sued the prime contractor and that contractor's surety to recover payment for work performed on a federal construction project, including for costs incurred as a result of a delay not attributable to the subcontractor. After this action was filed, the prime c
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE APPLICATION OF CONRAD SMITH, ET AL. FOR ACCESS TO Misc. Case No. 24-165 (JEB) GRAND JURY PROCEEDING MATERIALS IN UNITED STATES V. TRUMP MEMORANDUM OPINION Conrad Smith and six other current or former U.S. Capitol Police Officers have sued President Donald J. Trump and a host o
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017-12-20 · Published · cited 0× · 283 F. Supp. 3d 1333
Harold Lloyd Murphy, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is before the Court on the Motion to Exclude Testimony of Defendants' Retained Expert Bruce Penn Regarding the Subject Property's After-Take Value ("Motion to Exclude") filed by Plaintiff United States of America, upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority (the "TVA") ("Plaintiff") [44]. I. Background
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017-04-12 · Published · cited 0× · 249 F. Supp. 3d 1315; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67526
ORDER Harold L. Murphy, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is before the Court on the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [23] filed by Plaintiff United States of America upon the relation and for the use and benefit of the Tennessee Valley Authority (the “United States”). I. Background On November 17, 2016, the United States filed this action. (Compl
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-02-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 00869
Migadde v Permanent Mission of the Republic of Uganda to the United Nations (2024 NY Slip Op 00869) Migadde v Permanent Mission of the Republic of Uganda to the United Nations 2024 NY Slip Op 00869 Decided on February 20, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-04-01 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 977
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-04-01 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 977
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-04-01 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 977; 122 S. Ct. 1451; 70 U.S.L.W. 3614; 152 L. Ed. 2d 392; 2002 U.S. LEXIS 2263
535 U.S. 977 CONGHAU HUU TOv.UNITED STATES. No. 01-8534. Supreme Court of the United States. April 1, 2002. 1 C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013-01-28 · Published · cited 4× · 920 F. Supp. 2d 1168; 2013 WL 328512; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11955
ORDER THOMAS S. ZILLY, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Federal Defendant’s Motion to Limit Review to the Administrative Record, docket no. 101. Intervenor Defendants join in the motion in part, docket no. 105. Having reviewed all papers filed in support of, and in opposition to, the pending motion, the Court enters the following Order. I. Background</
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 8957
Matter of Castedo v Permanent Mission of Thailand to the United Nations (2019 NY Slip Op 08957) Matter of Castedo v Permanent Mission of Thailand to the United Nations 2019 NY Slip Op 08957 Decided on December 12, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015-02-04 · Published · cited 32× · 778 F.3d 43; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3994; 2015 WL 467525
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. In 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services (“Department”) awarded federal grant funds directly to Planned Parenthood of Northern New England (“Planned Parenthood”). New Hampshire Right to Life (“Right to Life”) then filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and ultimately this lawsuit, seeking documents related t