Cases

PER CURIAM: Leonardo Torres Delgado appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of conviction on trial to the jury (Milton Pollack, Judge) on two counts of uttering forged United States Treasury checks, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 495, 2 and two counts of pos

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm. Background In a March 20

KEARSE, Circuit Judge: These are appeals from judgments of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Eugene H. Nickerson, Judge. Appellants Luis Sanchez, Juana Dominguez and Luz Alvarez were convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violat

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

807 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Juan Manuel ACOSTA, Martin Arreola-Romero, Angel Luis Ayala, Otha Barnes, Gerald Edward Durrance, Martina Casas Flores, Ramiro Hernandez-Duque, Jorge Lucatero-Torres, Belisario Gil Mendoza, Juan Manuel Mendoza, Raphael Pedroza Perez, Obiel Pineda-Pardo, Alfonso Rios, Jr., Jose Cesar Almeida, Jorge Alejandro Anaya-Medina, Luis Manuel Haces-Delgado, Alejandro De La Cruz-Plancarte, Javier De La

754 F.Supp.2d 336 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. Danny GUZMAN-CORREA [6], et al., Defendants. CR. No. 07-290 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 5, 2010. *337 Jose Capo-Iriarte, United States Attorneys' Office, Hato Rey, PR, for Plaintiff. Fernando J. Carlo-Gorbea, Fernando J. Carlo

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. RODRIGUEZ-TORRES, et al., Defendants. Criminal No. 07-302 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 2, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant Hernan Lugo Oliveri's ("Defendant") Motion for Bill of Particulars. (Docket No. 12

*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly respond to our order directing them to file a status report concerning how these appeals should proceed in view of this court’s decisions in O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed. Cir.2002) and Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002). The court previously granted the motion of Fernando Blanco et

543 U.S. 1194 AGUILAR-GARCIAv.UNITED STATESBRACEROLEMUSv.UNITED STATESCENTENO-SANCHEZv.UNITED STATESESPARZA-ROBLESv.UNITED STATESGONZALEZ-VALLEJOv.UNITED STATESMENDIETA-GOMEZv.UNITED STATESNAVA-ALVAREZv.UNITED STATESDELGADO-PEREZv.UNITED STATESTORRES-PESINAv.UNITED STATESRODRIGUEZ-PUENTEv.UNITED STATESSANTOS-SALINASv.UNITE

OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. On April 27, 1999, the United States of America (“United States”) filed this action against the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“Commonwealth”), its governor, and some of the governor’s cabinet members (collectively “the parties”), alleging violations of the civil rights of a group of persons with mental retardation and developmental disabilities living in resid

*1073(Reported below: 105 Fed. Appx. 618); (105 Fed. Appx. 618); (105 *1074Fed. Appx. 621); (106 Fed. Appx. 918); (105 Fed. Appx. 619); (105 Fed. Appx. 613); (105 Fed. Appx. 627); (105 Fed. Appx. 612); (105

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

23-6094(Con.), 23-6238(Con.) United States of America v. Constantinescu UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2024 Argued: December 2, 2024 Decided: August 14, 2025 Docket Nos. 23-6094(Con.), 23-6238(Con.) UNITED STATES OF AME

Case: 24-50431 Document: 69-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-50431 F

Appellate Case: 23-4074 Document: 123-1 Date Filed: 07/09/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 9, 2025