Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Toyota Tundra 2002”
Reed v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.public domain
825 Argued and submitted May 31, 2018; reversed and remanded as to Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Financial Services, otherwise affirmed January 23, 2020 Erik Loyal REED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION and Toyota Financial Services, foreign corporations, and Capitol Toyota, an Oregon corporati
Romo v. Cavender Toyota, Inc.public domain
330 S.W.3d 648 (2010) Sylvia S. ROMO, Bexar County Tax Assessor-Collector, Appellant, v. CAVENDER TOYOTA, INC., Appellee. No. 04-10-00199-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. October 20, 2010. *649 Clarkson F. Brown, Assistant District Attorney-Civil Section, San Antonio, TX, for Appellant.
United States v. Moore-Bushpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 19-1582 19-1625 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. NIA MOORE-BUSH, a/k/a Nia Dinzey, Defendant, Appellee. Nos. 19-1583 19-1626 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. DAPHNE MOORE
United States v. Centeno-Gonzalezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 17-1367 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ CENTENO-GONZÁLEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
Mohammad v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.public domain
THIEME, J. This products liability action arises out of a single vehicle accident that occurred on the Dulles access road in Fairfax, Virginia on February 15, 2003. This matter is before us on appeal by plaintiff Pazir Mohammad from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Toyota Motor Sales USA (“Toyota”), Darcars of Cherry Hill, Inc., and Aseer Mohammad. The defendants are the manufacturer, retail dealer, and t
United States v. Walter Jordan, IIIpublic domain
Case: 18-20564 Document: 00515235050 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/13/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 18-20564 Fifth Circuit FILED
United States v. Centeno-Gonzalezpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge Before the Court is defendant Jose Cen-teno-Gonzalez (“Centeno”)’s motion to suppress both a statement he made and physical evidence seized from the vehicle he was driving before being arrested. (Docket No. 39.) The United States opposed the motion, (Docket No. 44), and the Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Marcos E. Lopez, (Docket Nos. 4CMtl).
United States v. Truong Son Dopublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER CLAIRE V. EAGAN, District Judge. Now before the Court are Defendant Truong Son Do’s Motion to Suppress Evidence with Brief (Dkt. #43), Defendant Vinh Nguyen’s Motion to Suppress Evidence with Brief in Support (Dkt. # 48), and defendant Hong Van Thi Nguyen’s Motion to Join in Defendant Do’s Motion to- Suppress (Dkt. # 49). Defendants Truong Son Do (Do), Hong Van Thi Nguyen (Hon
United States v. Bullcomingpublic domain
579 F.3d 1200 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Dean BULLCOMING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-6010. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. September 3, 2009. *1201 Submitted on the briefs[*]. *1202 Fred L. Staggs, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defend
United States v. Harveypublic domain
GOMEZ, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 29, 2006) Before the Court is the motion of Kevin Harvey (“Harvey”) to suppress all evidence seized as a result of his arrest on November 3, 2005. A suppression hearing was held on this matter on May 24, 2006. Following oral argument, the Court requested additional briefing from both parties on issues raised at the hearing but not
United States v. García-Álvarezpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Following a jury trial, Ángel García-Ál-varez (“García”) was convicted of carjacking and firearms offenses. Thereafter, the district court denied his motion for new trial, finding that the evidence it was premised on was not newly discovered. Garcia now appeals his conviction on sufficiency and evidentiary grounds, and challenges the denial of his motion for a new trial- Following a careful review, we
United States v. Garcia-Alvarezpublic domain
541 F.3d 8 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Angel GARCÍA-ÁLVAREZ, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 07-1471, 07-1697. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard March 7, 2008. Decided September 4, 2008. *11 Joannie Plaza-Martínez, Assistant Federal Public Defender, with whom Joseph C. Laws, Jr., F
United States v. One Dodge Durango 2004public domain
545 F.Supp.2d 197 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff(s) v. ONE DODGE DURANGO 2004, et al., Defendant(s). Civil No. 05-1081 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 15, 2006. *199 Maritza Gonzalez, United States Attorney's Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. OPINION AND ORDER B
THIS DISPOSITION IS CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Oral Hearing: June 9, 2005 Mailed: January 10, 2006 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ______ Standard Knitting, Ltd. v. Toyo
McGruder v. Statepublic domain
APPELLANT ATTORNEY: M. Patrick Maguire, M. Patrick Maguire, P.C., 945 Barnett Street, Kerrville, TX 78028. APPELLEE ATTORNEY: Tonya Spaeth Ahlschwede, 452nd District Attorney, 111 Austin Street, P.O. Box 635, Mason, TX 76856. Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice, Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice, Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
State v. Emerickpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Emerick, 2020-Ohio-3510.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. John W. Wise, J.
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Richard Diazpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-21-00086-CV TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant V. RICHARD DIAZ, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 13 Ha
State v. Riveira.public domain
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 31-AUG-2021 08:34 AM Dkt. 9 OPA
City of Houston v. Martha Vogel and Maria Escalantepublic domain
Opinion issued November 8, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00071-CV ——————————— CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant V. MARTHA VOGEL AND MARIA ES
State v. Carter-Brueggemanpublic domain
09/02/2025 DA 24-0402 Case Number: DA 24-0402 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2025 MT 193 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ALISON BETH CARTER-BRUEGGEMAN, Def