Cases

MEMORANDUM * Appellant Kevin Tubbs appeals a 151-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea by negotiated agreement to a *6856-count Information arising out of multiple arsons in the Pacific Northwest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The district court did not violate Apprendi v. New Jersey,

OPINION OF THE COURT JOHNSON, Senior Judge: The appellant was tried by a general court-martial consisting of officers. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon and two specifications each of simple assault and conduct unbecoming an officer, in violation of Articles 128 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 928 and 933 (1982), respectively [hereinafter

988 F.2d 1216 U.S.v.Tubbs*** NOS. 91-3609, 91-3637 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Mar 19, 1993 1 Appeal From: M.D.Fla. 2 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

935 F.2d 1283 U.S.v.Tubbs (Eric S.) NO. 90-1601 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. MAY 31, 1991 1 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. 2 AFFIRMED IN PART, REMANDED IN PART.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-­tiorari denied.

591 F.2d 1345 U. S.v.Tubbs No. 78-2958 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 2/8/79 1 D.Ariz. AFFIRMED

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.

513 F.2d 636 U. S.v.Tubbs 74-2001 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Seventh Circuit 4/24/75 1 S.D.Ind. AFFIRMED

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: The appellant was tried by a general court-martial and, contrary to his pleas, was convicted of desertion and absence without leave in violation of Articles 85 and 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) (10 U.S.C. §§ 885 and 886). He received the approved sentence set forth above. On 19 September 1967 the appellant absented himself without permission f

543 U.S. 1111 TUBBSv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-6747. Supreme Court of United States. January 24, 2005. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 96 Fed. Appx. 257; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases re

TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge: Plaintiff, Mark David, a division of Baker, Knapp, and Tubbs, Inc. (“Mark David” or “Plaintiff’), moves for judgment on the agency record contesting defendant United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) determination in Wooden Bedroom, Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Anti-dumping Duty Administrative Revie

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Flood waters from the Missouri River heavily destroyed the family farm of Thomas and Dana Lynn Tubbs in 2011. The Tubbses attribute the total loss to BNSF Railway Company’s maintenance of a railway embankment running across their farm. The Surface Transportation Board (“Board”) concluded that the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1

Opinion of the Court Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge: This accused was convicted by general court-martial in Korea of misbehavior before the enemy in violation of Article 99 of the Uniform Code of MUi-*589tary Justice, 50 USC § 693. The specification alleged that he was guilty of misbehavior by cowardly conduct in the presence of the enemy in that he

30 F.3d 142 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. UNI

[Cite as State v. Tubbs, 2024-Ohio-5042.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. QUAYSHAUN WILLIE TUBBS, Defendant-Appellant.