Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION JERRY A. BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the court on June 13 through 16, 2005 as a trial on the complaint of Trevor G. Bryan, as responsible party of Crutcher-Tufts Resources, Inc. and Crutcher-Tufts Resources, L.P., the debtors, seeking declaratory judgment as to whether defendant Tufts Energy, LLC has a limited partnership interest in Crutcher-Tufts Resources,

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 22-P-15 Appeals Court TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER vs. MA

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1030 MELISSA ING, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. TUFTS UNIVERSITY, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge] Be

OPINION SUTIN, Judge. {1} In this appeal, we must construe a statute proscribing the sending of forbidden “obscene images” to a child under sixteen years of age by means of an “electronic communication device.” See NMSA 1978, § 30-37-3.3 (2007). Defendant Robert George Tufts was convicted under the statute based on his having hand-delivered such images contained on an S

[Cite as Tufts Carter v. Hymes, 2020-Ohio-3967.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA DENISE TUFTS CARTER, : ADMINISTRATOR, : Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 108523 : v.

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13472 HENRY H. WORTIS & others1 vs. TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE. Middlesex. N

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00143-CR ___________________________ JOHN TUFTS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 211th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. F18-3014-211 Before Kerr, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: ___________ 3 Filing Date: April 7, 2015 4 NO. 33,419 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 6 Plaintiff-Appellee, 7 v. 8 ROBERT GEORGE TUFTS, 9 Defendant-Appellant. 10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 11 Marci Beyer, District Judge 12 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 13 Paula E. Ganz, Assistant Attorney General 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Appellee 16 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defen

461 U. S. 300; and 461 U. S. 934. Petitions for rehearing denied.

431 F.Supp. 484 (1976) Eloise TUFTS, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. C75-563. United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D. December 14, 1976. *485 James M. Mancini, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff. Joseph A. Cipollone, Asst. U. S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

ORDER MANOS, District Judge. This is an action instituted pursuant to the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, wherein the plaintiff, Eloise Tufts, seeks reinstatement to her position as a distribution clerk at the United States Postal Service (USPS), asserting that the defendants unlawfully terminated her on July 3,1973. She also seeks back pay, de

Justice Blackmun delivered the opinion of the Court. Over 35 years ago, in Crane v. Commissioner, 331 U. S. 1 (1947), this Court ruled that a taxpayer, who sold property encumbered by a nonrecourse mortgage (the amount of the *302mortgage being less than the property’s value), must include the unpaid balance of the mortgage in the computa

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 456 U. S. 960.] Motion of Wayne G. Barnett for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.

USCA11 Case: 19-11496 Date Filed: 10/20/2020 Page: 1 of 15 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ Nos. 19-11496 & 19-11603 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cv-005

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.

Tufte, Justice. [¶ 1] -Anoulak Thornsavan appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress and from the civil judgment forfeiting $127,930 to the State. We affirm, concluding there was reasonable suspicion to extend the traffic stop and a Miranda warning was not required. I [¶ 2] In July 2015, Officer Mason Ware pulled over Thornsavan, a

Keywords: Summary Judgment; RCFC 56; Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); Confidential Informants; IRS Reward Agreements; Anticipatory Repudiation; Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Accounting. OPINION AND ORDER KAPLAN, Judge. In [***], the plaintiff in this case, Confidential Infor

Simpson, Judge: The Commissioner determined the following deficiencies in the petitioners’ Federal income taxes: Petitioner TYE Deficiency John F. Tufts and Mary A. Tufts.12/31/72 $30,398.75 Clark, Inc. 7/31/73 12,729.68