Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Tyson Foods, Inc.”
United States v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
258 F.Supp.2d 809 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. TYSON FOODS, INC., Robert Hash, Gerald Lankford, Keith Snyder, Truley Ponder, Spencer Mabe, and Jimmy Rowland. No.4:01-cr-061. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester. January 14, 2003. *811 Roger W. Dickson, Travis McDonough, Miller & Martin, Chattanoo
United States v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
191 F.Supp.2d 142 (2002) UNITED STATES v. TYSON FOODS, INC., Defendant. No. CR.A. 97-0506RMU. United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 5, 2002. John P. MacCoon, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chattanooga, TN, for the Government. Thomas C. Green, Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Washington, DC, for the Defendant. ORDER <
Davis v. Tyson Prepared Foods, Inc.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeopublic domain
Justice KENNEDYdelivered the opinion of the Court. Following a jury trial, a class of employees recovered $2.9 million in compensatory damages from their employer for a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), 52 Stat. 1060 , as amended,
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeopublic domain
TYSON FOODS, INC., petitioner, v. Peg BOUAPHAKEO, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated.Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Hithon v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Adams v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo ex rel. Situatedpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.
Chao v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND OTHERWISE DENYING DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY RECIPIENTS’ MOTION TO QUASH TRIAL SUBPOENAS SERVED ON OUT-OF-STATE WITNESSES VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the Defendant and Third Party Subpoena Recipients’ Motion to Quash Trial Subpoenas Served on Out-of-State Witnesses. (Doc. 319.) For reasons discussed below, the motion is GRANTED
Chao v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFF FROM USING THE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF HER OWN MANAGERS AND INVESTIGATORS IN LIEU OF LIVE TESTIMONY VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Tyson’s Motion In Limine to Preclude Plaintiff from *561Using the Deposition Testimony
Chao v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
(2008) Elaine L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff, v. TYSON FOODS, INC., Defendant. No. 2:02-CV-1174-VEH. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. January 22, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. Before the court are (1)
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Quantum Foods, LLC v. Tyson Foods, Inc. (In re Quantum Foods, LLC)public domain
OPINION2 BY: KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Committee”) of Quantum *731Foods, LLC seeks to avoid and recover multiple transfers totaling $13,596,149 to Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. and $151,784 to Tyson Foods, Inc. (referred to jointly herein as “Tyson”) pur
Higgins v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc., ante, p. 454 (per curiam).
Hithon v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
546 U.S. ___ (2006) ANTHONY ASH, ET AL. v. TYSON FOODS, INC. No. 05-379. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 21, 2006. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. PER CURIAM. Petitioners Anthony Ash and John Hithon were superintendents at a poultry plant owned and operated by respondent Tyson
De Asencio v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
500 F.3d 361 (2007) Melania Felix DE ASENCIO; Manuel A. Gutierrez; Asela Ruiz; Eusebia Ruiz; Luis A. Vigo; Luz Cordova; Hector Pantajos, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals, Appellants v. TYSON FOODS, INC. No. 06-3502. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued July 12, 2007. Filed September 6, 2007.
Wilson v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Miller v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Miller v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Wilson v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.