Cases

*300Opinion by Judge DAILEY. 1 1 Defendant, Mustafa J. Ujaama, appeals the judgments of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of first degree murder (after deliberation) and aggravated motor vehicle theft,. We affirm. I. Background 1 2 While defendant, his wife, S.R., and six-year-old stepdaughter,

SUMMARY ORDER Oussama Kassir appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of (1) providing and concealing material support and resources to terrorists, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 2339A, 2339B, 2; (2) conspiring to provide and conceal material support and resources to terrorists, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 2339A, 2339B, 2; (3) conspiring to kill, kidnap, maim, and injure persons in a foreign country, 18 U.S.C. § 956; and (4) distributing in

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: In 2004, Mostafa Kamel Mostafa, also referred to in this action as Abu Hamza and Abu Hamza al-Masri, was indicted on eleven separate counts. (Indictment (“Ind.”), ECF No. 1.) He was arrested in *455England in 2004 and, after facing charges there, was extradited to the United State

305 F.Supp.2d 723 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. (D-1) Karim KOUBRITI, (D-2) Ahmed Hannan, and (D-4) Abdel Ilah Elmardoudi, Defendants. No. 01-80778. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 16, 2003. *724 Asst. U.S. Attorney Eric Strauss, Detroit, MI, for the Government. Ler

En Banc JUSTICE GABRIEL delivered the Opinion of the Court, ¶ 1 In this case we review two issues: (1) whether a double jeopardy claim can be raised for the first time on appeal and (2) whether defendant William Costello Scott’s convictions for both aggravated robbery-menaced with a deadly weapon (“aggravated robbery-menaced victim”) and menacing amounte

CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 This ease requires us to address two issues we recently addressed in two other cases, People v. Jefferson, 2017 CO 35, 393 P.3d 493, and Venalonzo v. People, 2017 CO 9, 388 P.3d 868. Specifically, we must resolve whether (1) a trial court commits plain error when it fails to limit, sua sponte, a jury

SUMMARY August 22, 2024 2024COA94 No. 22CA1805, People v. Perez — Constitutional Law — Sixth Amendment — Confrontation Clause — Recorded Jailhouse Phone Calls — Testimonial Statements A division of the court of appeals considers,

JUSTICE SAMOUR delivered the Opinion of the Court. *1075¶1 "[O]urs is an accusatorial and not an inquisitorial system-a system in which the State must establish guilt by evidence independently and freely secured and may not by coercion prove its charge against an accused out of his own mouth." Rogers v. Richmond ,

JUSTICE HART delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 We granted certiorari to determine whether the trial court plainly erred when it sentenced the defendant, Alfred Sandoval, to an aggravated community corrections sentence based on judicial fact-finding to which Sandoval did not stipulate. 1 We find that it did.

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

Opinion by Judge ROMAN. ' 1 Defendant, Thomas Deloss Rogers, appeals his jury conviction for possession of a weapon by a prior offender. We affirm. I. Background T2 On July 20, 2009, a man (the driver) picked up defendant at a local motel. When the car left the parking lot, a police officer executed a traffic stop after the driver failed

*682Opinion by JUDGE DAILEY ' 1 Defendant, Joann Dinapoli, appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found her guilty of second degree assault We affirm. ~I. Background 2 KM. testified as follows. Her dog and defendant's dog "got into a tussle." After the dogs separated, defendant sereamed at K.M. In r

Opinion by JUDGE LICHTENSTEIN T1 Defendant, Ruby Lynn Trujillo, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of identity theft and theft of less than $500 from an at-risk adult,. We affirm, L. Backg1 ound 1 2 TI‘UJIHO worked at an assisted living facility and, one weekend, took $250 in cash and a debit card from a resident. Trujillo u

Opinion by JUDGE CASEBOLT 1 1 Defendant, Robert Roletto, appeals the district court's order revoking his probation based on his failure to pay restitution. We affirm, I. Background 1 2 Defendant pleaded guilty to defrauding a secured creditor and second degree perjury. The court sentenced him to probation for five years. A condition of his probation required him to pay rest

Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch’s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association’s homepage at http://www.cobar.org. ADVANCE SHEET HEADNOTE May 30, 2017

Opinion by JUDGE WEBB ¶ 1 A jury convicted Sandra L. Jacobson of vehicular homicide, driving under the influence (DUI), and other related charges, all arising from a collision between her truck and a taxi cab. Two passengers in the taxi were killed. On appeal, Jacobson primarily contends the trial court erred when it refused her counsel's request to poll the jury concerning exposure to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible,

Opinion by JUDGE VOGT * €1 Defendant, Emmanuel C. Theus-Rob-erts, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of attempted first degree murder, first degree assault, aggravated robbery, second degree assault, and two crime of violence sentence enhancers. We affirm. I. Background 1 2 According to the prosecu

Opinion by CHIEF JUDGE LOEB € 1 Defendant, Evelin Campos, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding her guilty of identity theft and criminal impersonation. We affirm. I. Background 1 2 This case involves the unauthorized use of another person's name and social security number for employment purposes. S.A. discovered that several people, including Campos,

Opinion by JUDGE TAUBMAN {1 Defendant, Logan Scott McClelland, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of reckless manslaughter. We reverse and remand for a new trial. I. Background T2 On the afternoon of August 9, 2009, McClelland accompanied his father Tom and brother Luke to a water station outside of Monument, Colorado. To