⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Valdez-Campos”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 15 F. App'x 831
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves for summary affirmance of the April 30, 1998 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment. Leonardo Nery et al. oppose. Nery et al. served the United States as New Philippine Scouts during and after World War II. Nery et al. filed a civil action
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-CF-0349 GARY N. PROCTOR, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-06-18 · Published · cited 8× · 140 F.4th 1157
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50072 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-00083- v. RGK-1 ELIEL NUNEZ SANCHEZ, AKA Eliel Nunez, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central Di
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-06-07 · Published · cited 4× · 105 F.4th 235
Case: 21-50642 Document: 189-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 21-50642 June 7, 2024
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30177 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. V. 3:19-cr-00408- IM-1 LEOPOLDO RIVERA-VALDES, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted En Bane March 19, 2025 San Francisco, California Filed September 18, 2025 Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Ronald M. Gould, Consuelo
District Court, D. Maryland · 2018-08-31 · Published · cited 0× · 328 F. Supp. 3d 479
Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge Pedro Jose Ordoñez is facing trial for illegal reentry into the United States after prior removal,1 in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). Indictment, ECF No. 1. If convicted, he faces imprisonment of up to twenty years. He has f
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020-06-25 · Published · cited 1× · 962 F.3d 1056
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3363 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Jesus Pineda Ramirez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024-11-12 · Published · cited 21× · 121 F.4th 772
Appellate Case: 22-3286 Document: 105-1 Date Filed: 11/12/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 12, 2024
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019-07-26 · Published · cited 0× · 392 F. Supp. 3d 809
JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge Defendant Leopoldo Vargas-Molina was indicted for unlawful reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He filed two motions to dismiss the indictment, both of which go to the validity of his underlying removal order from 2011. Vargas-Molina relies upon § 1326(d) to collaterally att
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-08-24 · Published · cited 56× · 901 F.3d 523
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: We withdraw the prior panel opinion and substitute the following: With its colorful history and rich cultural stew, Louisiana has long been a popular setting for works of fiction, including movies. In recent years the state has also tried to become a place where films are made. That effort enjoyed considerable success. The Cu
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 16-30104 Document: 00514593666 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-30104 FILED August 9, 20
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 16-30104 Document: 00514619324 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/28/2018 REVISED August 28, 2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 16-30104 August 24, 2018
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-07-02 · Published · cited 0× · 574 F. App'x 455
PER CURIAM: * Primarily at issue in this appeal is whether Hussein Ali Yassine (Mike Yas-sine) received a fair trial. He and Hadi Ali Yassine (collectively, Appellants) were convicted by a jury for conspiracy to knowingly conduct, and attempt to conduct, financial transactions which each believed involved proceeds of unlawful activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), (a)(l)(B)(i), and 18 U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015-10-29 · Published · cited 46× · 805 F.3d 557; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18861; 2015 WL 6742682
EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: After a jury trial, Robert Allen Stanford was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, and 1349; four counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2; five counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 2; one count of conspiracy to obstruct a Sec
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-06-08 · Published · cited 20× · 804 F.3d 920; 2015 D.A.R. 11; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9504
Order; Opinion by Judge IKUTA. ORDER The opinion filed on June 8, 2015, and published at 788 F.3d 1094, is hereby amended as follows: *924On page 1099, in the first full paragraph, should be replaced with <We have applied this obligation outside of the context of an alien’
District Court, D. Maryland · 2015-05-11 · Published · cited 0× · 105 F. Supp. 3d 497; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61613; 2015 WL 2244094
MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge. In October 2014, a federal grand jury returned a one-count indictment against Agustín Lopez-Collazo, charging him with illegal reentry into the United States, without consent, after having been previously removed from the country following conviction of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b)(2). ECF 1. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-50407 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, August 17, 2016
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-07-02 · Published · cited 89× · 757 F.3d 1092; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 1170; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12500; 2014 WL 2958593
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. These appeals, brought to us by Maria Vianey Medina-Copete (“Medina”) and Rafael Goxcon-Chagal (“Goxcon”) following them convictions on drug trafficking charges, requires us to consider an issue of first impression in our circuit. During the trial, the district court allowed a purported expert on certain religious iconography to testify that veneration of
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012-04-12 · Published · cited 58× · 676 F.3d 1264; 2012 WL 1216220; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7420
676 F.3d 1264 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher TOBIN, Jude LaCour, Akhil Baranwal, Geunnet Chebssi, James Pickens, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 09-13944, 09-13945, 09-13975, 09-14009 and 09-14012. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 12, 2012. *1270 Michael G. Nichola (Court-Ap
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013-06-28 · Published · cited 1× · 720 F.3d 1258; 2013 WL 3242515; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13283
MATHESON, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In 2011, a methamphetamine dealer in Oklahoma City and several of his buyers and sellers were indicted for their alleged involvement in a methamphetamine distribution conspiracy. Jesus Figueroa-La-brada, one of the buyers, was convicted of conspiring to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Mr. Fig